mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Diversity or Precision? A Deep Dive into Next Token Prediction

arXiv 2512.22955 ↗First posted 28 Dec 2025cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advancements have shown that reinforcement learning (RL) can substantially improve the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). The effectiveness of such RL training, however, depends critically on the exploration space defined by the pre-trained model's token-output distribution. In this paper, we revisit the standard cross-entropy loss, interpreting it as a specific instance of policy gradient optimization applied within a single-step episode. To systematically study how the pre-trained distribution shapes the exploration potential for subsequent RL, we propose a generalized pre-training objective that adapts on-policy RL principles to supervised learning. By framing next-token prediction as a stochastic decision process, we introduce a reward-shaping strategy that explicitly balances diversity and precision. Our method employs a positive reward scaling factor to control probability concentration on ground-truth tokens and a rank-aware mechanism that treats high-ranking and low-ranking negative tokens asymmetrically. This allows us to reshape the pre-trained token-output distribution and investigate how to provide a more favorable exploration space for RL, ultimately enhancing end-to-end reasoning performance. Contrary to the intuition that higher distribution entropy facilitates effective exploration, we find that imposing a precision-oriented prior yields a superior exploration space for RL.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 32 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2025.

Builds on

32 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning2 Jun
  2. 2025The Surprising Effectiveness of Negative Reinforcement in LLM Reasoning2 Jun
  3. 2025The Entropy Mechanism of Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Models28 May
  4. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale18 Mar
  5. 2025Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRs3 Mar
  6. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning22 Jan
  7. 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May

Other references · 25

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  4. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  6. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  7. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
  8. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  9. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  10. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  11. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
  12. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
13 more
  1. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  2. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
  3. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
  4. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
  5. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
  6. 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
  7. 2024Quiet-STaR: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Think Before Speakingcited by 292
  8. 2025Scaling Latent Reasoning via Looped Language Modelscited by 145
  9. 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 121
  10. 2025Reinforcement Pre-Trainingcited by 40
  11. 2025Reinforcement Learning on Pre-Training Datacited by 12
  12. 2025One-Token Rollout: Guiding Supervised Fine-Tuning of LLMs with Policy Gradientcited by 8
  13. 2025PretrainZero: Reinforcement Active Pretrainingcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026GMTS: Gradient Magnitude-based Token Selection Improves RLVR Training for LLM Reasoning
  2. 2025Do Not Let Low-Probability Tokens Over-Dominate in RL for LLMs
  3. 2026Which Tokens Matter? Adaptive Token Selection for RLVR with the Relative Surprisal Index
  4. 2026Reinforcement Learning with Promising Tokens for Large Language Models
  5. 2025Reinforcement Mid-Training
  6. 2026Not all tokens are needed(NAT): token efficient reinforcement learning
  7. 2026Not All Tokens Learn Alike: Attention Entropy Reveals Heterogeneous Signals in RL Reasoning
  8. 2025Low-probability Tokens Sustain Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward