mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TriCEGAR: A Trace-Driven Abstraction Mechanism for Agentic AI

arXiv 2601.22997 ↗First posted 30 Jan 2026cs.AI cs.SEcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Agentic AI systems act through tools and evolve their behavior over long, stochastic interaction traces. This setting complicates assurance, because behavior depends on nondeterministic environments and probabilistic model outputs. Prior work introduced runtime verification for agentic AI via Dynamic Probabilistic Assurance (DPA), learning an MDP online and model checking quantitative properties. A key limitation is that developers must manually define the state abstraction, which couples verification to application-specific heuristics and increases adoption friction. This paper proposes TriCEGAR, a trace-driven abstraction mechanism that automates state construction from execution logs and supports online construction of an agent behavioral MDP. TriCEGAR represents abstractions as predicate trees learned from traces and refined using counterexamples. We describe a framework-native implementation that (i) captures typed agent lifecycle events, (ii) builds abstractions from traces, (iii) constructs an MDP, and (iv) performs probabilistic model checking to compute bounds such as Pmax(success) and Pmin(failure). We also show how run likelihoods enable anomaly detection as a guardrailing signal.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 5 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2026.

Builds on

5 of 24 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025AgentGuard: Runtime Verification of AI Agents28 Sep

Other references · 4

  1. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
  2. 2024RepairAgent: An Autonomous, LLM-Based Agent for Program Repaircited by 225
  3. 2024TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Frameworkcited by 182
  4. 2017A storm is Coming: A Modern Probabilistic Model Checkercited by 34

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Are Agents Probabilistic Automata? A Trace-Based, Memory-Constrained Theory of Agentic AI
  2. 2026A Trace-Based Assurance Framework for Agentic AI Orchestration: Contracts, Testing, and Governance
  3. 2025ProbGuard: Proactive Runtime Monitoring for LLM Agent Safety via Probabilistic Prediction
  4. 2026Learning Correct Behavior from Examples: Validating Sequential Execution in Autonomous Agents
  5. 2026Engineering Reliable Commit Gates for Agentic AI: Cost-Aware Verification Portfolios under Common-Mode Data Failures
  6. 2026Containment Verification: AI Safety Guarantees Independent of Alignment
  7. 2026Efficient and Sound Probabilistic Verification for AI Agents
  8. 2026VIGIL: Runtime Enforcement of Behavioral Specifications in AI Agent Skills