mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Are Agents Probabilistic Automata? A Trace-Based, Memory-Constrained Theory of Agentic AI

arXiv 2510.23487 ↗First posted 27 Oct 2025cs.AI cs.FLcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper studies standard controller architectures for agentic AI and derives automata-theoretic models of their interaction behavior via trace semantics and abstraction. We model an agent implementation as a finite control program augmented with explicit memory primitives (bounded buffers, a call stack, or read/write external memory) and a stochastic policy component (e.g., an LLM) that selects among architecturally permitted actions. Instead of equating the concrete agent with a deterministic acceptor, we treat the agent-environment closed loop as inducing a probability distribution over finite interaction traces. Given an abstraction function Abs from concrete configurations to a finite abstract state space, we obtain a probabilistic trace language and an abstract probabilistic transition model MAbs suitable for probabilistic model checking. Imposing explicit, framework-auditable restrictions on memory access and control flow, we prove that the support of the resulting trace language is regular for bounded-memory controllers, context-free for strict call-return controllers, and recursively enumerable for controllers equipped with unbounded read/write memory. These correspondences allow the reuse of existing verification methods for finite-state and pushdown systems, and they delineate precisely when undecidability barriers arise. The probabilistic semantics leads to quantitative analyses such as: what is the probability of entering an unsafe abstract region, and how can we bound this probability in the presence of environment nondeterminism.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 4 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2025.

Builds on

4 of 23 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Formal-LLM: Integrating Formal Language and Natural Language for Controllable LLM-based Agents1 Feb

Other references · 3

  1. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
  2. 2023Auto-GPT for Online Decision Making: Benchmarks and Additional Opinionscited by 255
  3. 2017A storm is Coming: A Modern Probabilistic Model Checkercited by 34

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026TriCEGAR: A Trace-Driven Abstraction Mechanism for Agentic AI
  2. 2025AgentGuard: Runtime Verification of AI Agents
  3. 2025Mathematical Framing for Different Agent Strategies
  4. 2026Epistemic-Probabilistic Model for Guarded Multi-Agent LLM Coordination
  5. 2026Efficient and Sound Probabilistic Verification for AI Agents
  6. 2026Verification and Self-Improvement in Agentic AI: Foundations and Limits
  7. 2026The Path Ahead for Agentic AI: Challenges and Opportunities
  8. 2025Architectures for Building Agentic AI