mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DeRaDiff: Denoising Time Realignment of Diffusion Models

arXiv 2601.20198 ↗First posted 28 Jan 2026cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion and flow policies for robotics

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances align diffusion models with human preferences to increase aesthetic appeal and mitigate artifacts and biases. Such methods aim to maximize a conditional output distribution aligned with higher rewards whilst not drifting far from a pretrained prior. This is commonly enforced by KL (Kullback Leibler) regularization. As such, a central issue still remains: how does one choose the right regularization strength? Too high of a strength leads to limited alignment and too low of a strength leads to "reward hacking". This renders the task of choosing the correct regularization strength highly non-trivial. Existing approaches sweep over this hyperparameter by aligning a pretrained model at multiple regularization strengths and then choose the best strength. Unfortunately, this is prohibitively expensive. We introduce DeRaDiff, a denoising time realignment procedure that, after aligning a pretrained model once, modulates the regularization strength during sampling to emulate models trained at other regularization strengths without any additional training or finetuning. Extending decoding-time realignment from language to diffusion models, DeRaDiff operates over iterative predictions of continuous latents by replacing the reverse step reference distribution by a geometric mixture of an aligned and reference posterior, thus giving rise to a closed form update under common schedulers and a single tunable parameter, lambda, for on the fly control. Our experiments show that across multiple text image alignment and image-quality metrics, our method consistently provides a strong approximation for models aligned entirely from scratch at different regularization strengths. Thus, our method yields an efficient way to search for the optimal strength, eliminating the need for expensive alignment sweeps and thereby substantially reducing computational costs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and flow policies for robotics, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 29 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2026.

Builds on

29 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Diffusion Blend: Inference-Time Multi-Preference Alignment for Diffusion Models24 May
  2. 2023Diffusion Model Alignment Using Direct Preference Optimization21 Nov
  3. 2023Aligning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Reward Backpropagation5 Oct
  4. 2023Directly Fine-Tuning Diffusion Models on Differentiable Rewards29 Sep
  5. 2023Training Diffusion Models with Reinforcement Learning22 May

Other references · 24

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  4. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
  5. 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,185
  6. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  7. 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,005
  8. 2022Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Modelscited by 2,994
  9. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,388
  10. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  11. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
  12. 2023Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 950
12 more
  1. 2023Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 847
  2. 2023Aligning Text-to-Image Models using Human Feedbackcited by 418
  3. 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Mergingcited by 271
  4. 2023Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewardscited by 232
  5. 2023Practical and Asymptotically Exact Conditional Sampling in Diffusion Modelscited by 218
  6. 2023Manifold Preserving Guided Diffusioncited by 153
  7. 2022RL with KL penalties is better viewed as Bayesian inferencecited by 130
  8. 2016Sequence Tutor: Conservative Fine-Tuning of Sequence Generation Models with KL-controlcited by 100
  9. 2020Human-centric Dialog Training via Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 92
  10. 2025Test-time Alignment of Diffusion Models without Reward Over-optimizationcited by 89
  11. 2024Decoding-time Realignment of Language Modelscited by 67
  12. 2023An Emulator for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models using Small Language Modelscited by 61

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Training-free Diffusion Model Alignment with Sampling Demons
  2. 2025Directly Aligning the Full Diffusion Trajectory with Fine-Grained Human Preference
  3. 2024Inference-Time Alignment of Diffusion Models with Direct Noise Optimization
  4. 2025Inference-Time Alignment of Diffusion Models via Evolutionary Algorithms
  5. 2025MIRA: Towards Mitigating Reward Hacking in Inference-Time Alignment of T2I Diffusion Models
  6. 2025ShortFT: Diffusion Model Alignment via Shortcut-based Fine-Tuning
  7. 2026TMPDiff: Temporal Mixed-Precision for Diffusion Models
  8. 2025Unified Control for Inference-Time Guidance of Denoising Diffusion Models