Identifying and Correcting Label Noise for Robust GNNs via Influence Contradiction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown remarkable capabilities in learning from graph-structured data with various applications such as social analysis and bioinformatics. However, the presence of label noise in real scenarios poses a significant challenge in learning robust GNNs, and their effectiveness can be severely impacted when dealing with noisy labels on graphs, often stemming from annotation errors or inconsistencies. To address this, in this paper we propose a novel approach called ICGNN that harnesses the structure information of the graph to effectively alleviate the challenges posed by noisy labels. Specifically, we first design a novel noise indicator that measures the influence contradiction score (ICS) based on the graph diffusion matrix to quantify the credibility of nodes with clean labels, such that nodes with higher ICS values are more likely to be detected as having noisy labels. Then we leverage the Gaussian mixture model to precisely detect whether the label of a node is noisy or not. Additionally, we develop a soft strategy to combine the predictions from neighboring nodes on the graph to correct the detected noisy labels. At last, pseudo-labeling for abundant unlabeled nodes is incorporated to provide auxiliary supervision signals and guide the model optimization. Experiments on benchmark datasets show the superiority of our approach over competitive baselines in noisy label scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2026.
Builds on
46 of 71 references.
References · 46
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
- 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
- 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 994
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
34 more
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
- 2019Diffusion Improves Graph Learningcited by 414
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
- 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
- 2020Scaling Graph Neural Networks with Approximate PageRankcited by 174
- 2024Classic GNNs are Strong Baselines: Reassessing GNNs for Node Classificationcited by 83
- 2021NRGNN: Learning a Label Noise-Resistant Graph Neural Network on Sparsely and Noisily Labeled Graphscited by 73
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Deep Graph Representation Learningcited by 72
- 2022Towards Robust Graph Neural Networks for Noisy Graphs with Sparse Labelscited by 63
- 2020ASGN: An Active Semi-supervised Graph Neural Network for Molecular Property Predictioncited by 58
- 2021Topology-Imbalance Learning for Semi-Supervised Node Classificationcited by 56
- 2024A Survey of Graph Neural Networks in Real world: Imbalance, Noise, Privacy and OOD Challengescited by 54
- 2021Towards Understanding Deep Learning from Noisy Labels with Small-Loss Criterioncited by 36
- 2024Fully-inductive Node Classification on Arbitrary Graphscited by 36
- 2019Learning Graph Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 29
- 2022Robust Training of Graph Neural Networks via Noise Governancecited by 29
- 2023Learning on Graphs under Label Noisecited by 22
- 2021Unified Robust Training for Graph NeuralNetworks against Label Noisecited by 21
- 2021Noise-robust Graph Learning by Estimating and Leveraging Pairwise Interactionscited by 20
- 2024NoisyGL: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Graph Neural Networks under Label Noisecited by 16
- 2023Towards Semi-supervised Universal Graph Classificationcited by 15
- 2023Resurrecting Label Propagation for Graphs with Heterophily and Label Noisecited by 12
- 2023ERASE: Error-Resilient Representation Learning on Graphs for Label Noise Tolerancecited by 11
- 2023Networked Inequality: Preferential Attachment Bias in Graph Neural Network Link Predictioncited by 8
- 2024Hypergraph-enhanced Dual Semi-supervised Graph Classificationcited by 8
- 2023RAHNet: Retrieval Augmented Hybrid Network for Long-tailed Graph Classificationcited by 7
- 2023Combating Label Noise With A General Surrogate Model For Sample Selectioncited by 6
- 2025A Unified Invariant Learning Framework for Graph Classificationcited by 5
- 2024Learning under Temporal Label Noisecited by 4
- 2025Delving into Instance-Dependent Label Noise in Graph Data: A Comprehensive Study and Benchmarkcited by 4
- 2024DisenSemi: Semi-supervised Graph Classification via Disentangled Representation Learningcited by 3
- 2025Enhanced Sample Selection with Confidence Tracking: Identifying Correctly Labeled yet Hard-to-Learn Samples in Noisy Datacited by 3
- 2023Robust Loss Functions for Training Decision Trees with Noisy Labelscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.