White-Box Sensitivity Auditing with Steering Vectors
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Probing deception, bias and beliefs
Abstract (arXiv)
Algorithmic audits are essential tools for examining systems for properties required by regulators or desired by operators. Current audits of large language models (LLMs) primarily rely on black-box evaluations that assess model behavior only through input-output testing. These methods are limited to tests constructed in the input space, often generated by heuristics. In addition, many socially relevant model properties (e.g., gender bias) are abstract and difficult to measure through text-based inputs alone. To address these limitations, we propose a white-box sensitivity auditing framework for LLMs that leverages activation steering to conduct more rigorous assessments through model internals. Our auditing method conducts internal sensitivity tests by manipulating key concepts relevant to the model's intended function for the task. We demonstrate its application to bias audits in four simulated high-stakes LLM decision tasks. Our method consistently indicates substantial dependence on protected attributes in model predictions, even in settings where standard black-box evaluations suggest little or no bias. Our code is openly available at https://github.com/hannahxchen/llm-steering-audit
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Probing deception, bias and beliefs, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 56 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2026.
Builds on
56 of 78 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Dissecting Bias in LLMs: A Mechanistic Interpretability Perspective5 Jun
- 2025Unsupervised Concept Vector Extraction for Bias Control in LLMs27 Feb
Other references · 54
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
- 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,356
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
- 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 922
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 876
- 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 817
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
38 more
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 712
- 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 671
- 2023XSTest: A Test Suite for Identifying Exaggerated Safety Behaviours in Large Language Modelscited by 505
- 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 499
- 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 439
- 2021Measuring and Improving Consistency in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 364
- 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 349
- 2023State of What Art? A Call for Multi-Prompt LLM Evaluationcited by 310
- 2018Adversarial Example Generation with Syntactically Controlled Paraphrase Networkscited by 286
- 2023PromptRobust: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models on Adversarial Promptscited by 226
- 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 212
- 2023SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 199
- 2024Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 199
- 2019Certified Robustness to Adversarial Word Substitutionscited by 168
- 2018Counterfactual Fairness in Text Classification through Robustnesscited by 151
- 2024SaulLM-7B: A pioneering Large Language Model for Lawcited by 142
- 2024Does Prompt Formatting Have Any Impact on LLM Performance?cited by 141
- 2023Auditing large language models: a three-layered approachcited by 137
- 2024Black-Box Access is Insufficient for Rigorous AI Auditscited by 126
- 2023Evaluating and Mitigating Discrimination in Language Model Decisionscited by 124
- 2022The Fallacy of AI Functionalitycited by 88
- 2021Quantifying Social Biases in NLP: A Generalization and Empirical Comparison of Extrinsic Fairness Metricscited by 83
- 2024On the Origins of Linear Representations in Large Language Modelscited by 79
- 2019Perturbation Sensitivity Analysis to Detect Unintended Model Biasescited by 74
- 2024Instruction Pre-Training: Language Models are Supervised Multitask Learnerscited by 63
- 2020Fundamental Tradeoffs between Invariance and Sensitivity to Adversarial Perturbationscited by 55
- 2020Investigating African-American Vernacular English in Transformer-Based Text Generationcited by 53
- 2024What's in a Name? Auditing Large Language Models for Race and Gender Biascited by 51
- 2024Social Bias Evaluation for Large Language Models Requires Prompt Variationscited by 40
- 2025Model Tampering Attacks Enable More Rigorous Evaluations of LLM Capabilitiescited by 39
- 2020The Problem with Metrics is a Fundamental Problem for AIcited by 37
- 2018Adversarial Over-Sensitivity and Over-Stability Strategies for Dialogue Modelscited by 26
- 2025We Can't Understand AI Using our Existing Vocabularycited by 25
- 2025Privacy Auditing of Large Language Modelscited by 23
- 2025Rejected Dialects: Biases Against African American Language in Reward Modelscited by 20
- 2025Steering the CensorShip: Uncovering Representation Vectors for LLM "Thought" Controlcited by 14
- 2022An External Stability Audit Framework to Test the Validity of Personality Prediction in AI Hiringcited by 10
- 2023Generalization Analogies: A Testbed for Generalizing AI Oversight to Hard-To-Measure Domainscited by 8
50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Activation Steering for Bias Mitigation: An Interpretable Approach to Safer LLMs
- 2025Shifting Perspectives: Steering Vectors for Robust Bias Mitigation in LLMs
- 2024An Auditing Test To Detect Behavioral Shift in Language Models
- 2025Auditing language models for hidden objectives
- 2025Bias Testing and Mitigation in Black Box LLMs using Metamorphic Relations
- 2025Beyond Black-Box Obfuscation: Mechanistic Analysis and Defense of White-Box Monitors
- 2026Latent space bias directions in LLMs capture confidence, not fairness
- 2026Steered LLM Activations are Non-Surjective