mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond Black-Box Obfuscation: Mechanistic Analysis and Defense of White-Box Monitors

arXiv 2505.14300 ↗First posted 20 May 2025cs.AI cs.CL cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

White-box monitoring is increasingly adopted as an auditing tool as Large Language Models (LLMs) are deployed in daily operations to ensure safe model behavior. However, white-box monitors can be circumvented, and the mechanisms underlying such evasion have not been systematically characterized, nor have principled defenses been proposed. This work addresses both challenges. Controlled red-team experiments reveal two primary evasion strategies: geometric shifting, defined as the systematic migration of information between linear and non-linear representational subspaces, and covariance manipulation. These mechanisms account for the failure of single-detector approaches, as information migrates to subspaces inaccessible to individual detectors. This issue is urgent due to growing evidence that models are becoming evaluation-aware, enabling those with misaligned objectives to exploit these vulnerabilities and evade monitoring during deployment. In response, textscSafetyNet is introduced as a principled ensemble, with dual purpose: it provides further empirical validation that our mechanistic findings are real and actionable, and it offers a concrete starting point for future work on robust latent-space monitoring. The study experiment across five model families on the MAD and Anthropic Sleeper Agent benchmark, with SafetyNet achieving around 100% AUROC scores outscoring Beatrix and CROW. The code is available at: https://github.com/MaheepChaudhary/eval-aware-evasion

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.

Builds on

12 of 24 references.

References · 12

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  3. 2024Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Trainingcited by 529
  4. 2022Why Can GPT Learn In-Context? Language Models Implicitly Perform Gradient Descent as Meta-Optimizerscited by 204
  5. 2023Universal Jailbreak Backdoors from Poisoned Human Feedbackcited by 128
  6. 2023Scheming AIs: Will AIs fake alignment during training in order to get power?cited by 97
  7. 2024Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Layer-specific Editingcited by 79
  8. 2022The "Beatrix'' Resurrections: Robust Backdoor Detection via Gram Matricescited by 63
  9. 2024Safety Cases: How to Justify the Safety of Advanced AI Systemscited by 48
  10. 2024Obfuscated Activations Bypass LLM Latent-Space Defensescited by 45
  11. 2025Transformers Learn to Implement Multi-step Gradient Descent with Chain of Thoughtcited by 32
  12. 2023Robust Backdoor Detection for Deep Learning via Topological Evolution Dynamicscited by 26

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025RL-Obfuscation: Can Language Models Learn to Evade Latent-Space Monitors?
  2. 2025Linear probes rely on textual evidence: Results from leakage mitigation studies in language models
  3. 2026MechAudit-40: White-Box Auditing across 40 LLM Attack Mechanisms
  4. 2026Caught in the Act: Probes Effectively Detect Sabotage and Catch Unverbalized Deception
  5. 2026White-Box Sensitivity Auditing with Steering Vectors
  6. 2026Do Activation Monitors Survive Model Updates? Benchmarking, Predicting, and Repairing Activation-Monitor Staleness
  7. 2026Probe Generalization as Subspace Selection for OOD Deception Detection
  8. 2026Linear Probe Accuracy Scales with Model Size and Benefits from Multi-Layer Ensembling