mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Combating Noisy Labels through Fostering Self- and Neighbor-Consistency

arXiv 2601.12795 ↗First posted 19 Jan 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Label noise is pervasive in various real-world scenarios, posing challenges in supervised deep learning. Deep networks are vulnerable to such label-corrupted samples due to the memorization effect. One major stream of previous methods concentrates on identifying clean data for training. However, these methods often neglect imbalances in label noise across different mini-batches and devote insufficient attention to out-of-distribution noisy data. To this end, we propose a noise-robust method named Jo-SNC (Joint sample selection and model regularization based on Self- and Neighbor-Consistency). Specifically, we propose to employ the Jensen-Shannon divergence to measure the ``likelihood'' of a sample being clean or out-of-distribution. This process factors in the nearest neighbors of each sample to reinforce the reliability of clean sample identification. We design a self-adaptive, data-driven thresholding scheme to adjust per-class selection thresholds. While clean samples undergo conventional training, detected in-distribution and out-of-distribution noisy samples are trained following partial label learning and negative learning, respectively. Finally, we advance the model performance further by proposing a triplet consistency regularization that promotes self-prediction consistency, neighbor-prediction consistency, and feature consistency. Extensive experiments on various benchmark datasets and comprehensive ablation studies demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of our approach over existing state-of-the-art methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 66 of its 108 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2026.

Builds on

66 of 108 references.

References · 66

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  4. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  5. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  6. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  7. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  8. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  9. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  10. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
  11. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  12. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,512
38 more
  1. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  2. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  3. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
  4. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  5. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 675
  6. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  7. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  8. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
  9. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  10. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  11. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  12. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  13. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  14. 2022FreeMatch: Self-adaptive Thresholding for Semi-supervised Learningcited by 232
  15. 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
  16. 2022Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation Using Unreliable Pseudo-Labelscited by 218
  17. 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
  18. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  19. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  20. 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
  21. 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
  22. 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
  23. 2017Active Bias: Training More Accurate Neural Networks by Emphasizing High Variance Samplescited by 147
  24. 2020Self-Adaptive Training: beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 126
  25. 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
  26. 2020Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 102
  27. 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
  28. 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
  29. 2021Non-Salient Region Object Mining for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 95
  30. 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
  31. 2017Learning from Complementary Labelscited by 88
  32. 2021FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 82
  33. 2021Jo-SRC: A Contrastive Approach for Combating Noisy Labelscited by 80
  34. 2020A Topological Filter for Learning with Label Noisecited by 76
  35. 2022Learning with Neighbor Consistency for Noisy Labelscited by 55
  36. 2024Poly Kernel Inception Network for Remote Sensing Detectioncited by 52
  37. 2021Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 49
  38. 2021Webly Supervised Fine-Grained Recognition: Benchmark Datasets and An Approachcited by 32

50 most cited of 66 All 66 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.