PRPO: Aligning Process Reward with Outcome Reward in Policy Optimization
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Process reward models for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Policy optimization for large language models often suffers from sparse reward signals in multi-step reasoning tasks. Critic-free methods like GRPO assign a single normalized outcome reward to all tokens, providing limited guidance for intermediate reasoning . While Process Reward Models (PRMs) offer dense feedback, they risk premature collapse when used alone, as early low-reward tokens can drive policies toward truncated outputs. We introduce Process Relative Policy Optimization (PRPO), which combines outcome reliability with process-level guidance in a critic-free framework. PRPO segments reasoning sequences based on semantic clues, normalizes PRM scores into token-level advantages, and aligns their distribution with outcome advantages through location-parameter shift. On MATH500, PRPO improves Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B accuracy from 61.2% to 64.4% over GRPO using only eight rollouts and no value network, demonstrating efficient fine-grained credit assignment within critic-free optimization. Code is available at: https://github.com/SchumiDing/srpocode
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 19 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2026.
Builds on
19 of 24 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Stop Summation: Min-Form Credit Assignment Is All Process Reward Model Needs for Reasoning21 Apr
- 2025More Bang for the Buck: Process Reward Modeling with Entropy-Driven Uncertainty28 Mar
- 2025Full-Step-DPO: Self-Supervised Preference Optimization with Step-wise Rewards for Mathematical Reasoning20 Feb
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning13 Jan
- 2025PRMBench: A Fine-grained and Challenging Benchmark for Process-Level Reward Models6 Jan
- 2024Step-DPO: Step-wise Preference Optimization for Long-chain Reasoning of LLMs26 Jun
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations14 Dec
Other references · 12
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,345
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
- 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoningcited by 559
- 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervisioncited by 441
- 2025TGRPO :Fine-tuning Vision-Language-Action Model via Trajectory-wise Group Relative Policy Optimizationcited by 49
- 2025ETTRL: Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in LLM Test-Time Reinforcement Learning Via Entropy Mechanismcited by 36
- 2024Process Supervision-Guided Policy Optimization for Code Generationcited by 26
- 2025RiskPO: Risk-based Policy Optimization via Verifiable Reward for LLM Post-Trainingcited by 12
- 2025Token-Level Policy Optimization: Linking Group-Level Rewards to Token-Level Aggregation via Markov Likelihoodcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.
7 papers.
- 2026Does Your Reasoning Model Implicitly Know When to Stop Thinking?cited by 19
- 2026Real-Time Aligned Reward Model beyond Semanticscited by 13
- 2026When Models Learn to Ask Why: Adaptive Causal Reasoning for Trustworthy Medical Vision-Language Modelscited by 6
- 2026One Refiner to Unlock Them All: Inference-Time Reasoning Elicitation via Reinforcement Query Refinementcited by 6
- 2026SQL-ASTRA: Alleviating Sparse Feedback in Agentic SQL via Column-Set Matching and Trajectory Aggregationcited by 3
- 2026StainFlow: Entity-Stain Tracking and Evidence Linking for Process Rewards in GUI Agentscited by 2
- 2026Placing Puzzle Pieces Where They Matter: A Question Augmentation Framework for Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026StainFlow: Entity-Stain Tracking and Evidence Linking for Process Rewards in GUI Agents5 Jun 2026
- 2026One Refiner to Unlock Them All: Inference-Time Reasoning Elicitation via Reinforcement Query Refinement28 Apr 2026
- 2026Placing Puzzle Pieces Where They Matter: A Question Augmentation Framework for Reinforcement Learning17 Apr 2026
- 2026When Models Learn to Ask Why: Adaptive Causal Reasoning for Trustworthy Medical Vision-Language Models24 Mar 2026
- 2026SQL-ASTRA: Alleviating Sparse Feedback in Agentic SQL via Column-Set Matching and Trajectory Aggregation17 Mar 2026
- 2026Does Your Reasoning Model Implicitly Know When to Stop Thinking?9 Feb 2026
- 2026Real-Time Aligned Reward Model beyond Semantics30 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025GRPO is Secretly a Process Reward Model
- 2026LLM Reasoning with Process Rewards for Outcome-Guided Steps
- 2024PSPO*: An Effective Process-supervised Policy Optimization for Reasoning Alignment
- 2026GRPO-VPS: Enhancing Group Relative Policy Optimization with Verifiable Process Supervision for Effective Reasoning
- 2025A Survey of Process Reward Models: From Outcome Signals to Process Supervisions for Large Language Models
- 2026BoT-GRPO: Efficient Process-Reward RL for Reasoning via Bag-of-Token Aggregation
- 2026Save the Good Prefix: Precise Error Penalization via Process-Supervised RL to Enhance LLM Reasoning
- 2026Range-GRPO: Policy Optimization via Pairwise Relations among Reward Intervals