mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PSPO*: An Effective Process-supervised Policy Optimization for Reasoning Alignment

arXiv 2411.11681 ↗First posted 18 Nov 2024cs.AI cs.LGcited by 8

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Process supervision enhances the performance of large language models in reasoning tasks by providing feedback at each step of chain-of-thought reasoning. However, due to the lack of effective process supervision methods, even advanced large language models are prone to logical errors and redundant reasoning. We claim that the effectiveness of process supervision significantly depends on both the accuracy and the length of reasoning chains. Moreover, we identify that these factors exhibit a nonlinear relationship with the overall reward score of the reasoning process. Inspired by these insights, we propose a novel process supervision paradigm, PSPO*, which systematically outlines the workflow from reward model training to policy optimization, and highlights the importance of nonlinear rewards in process supervision. Based on PSPO*, we develop the PSPO-WRS, which considers the number of reasoning steps in determining reward scores and utilizes an adjusted Weibull distribution for nonlinear reward shaping. Experimental results on six mathematical reasoning datasets demonstrate that PSPO-WRS consistently outperforms current mainstream models.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 5 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Nov 2024.

Builds on

5 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback25 Nov

Other references · 4

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  4. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Survey of Process Reward Models: From Outcome Signals to Process Supervisions for Large Language Models
  2. 2026PRPO: Aligning Process Reward with Outcome Reward in Policy Optimization
  3. 2023Let's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for Reasoning
  4. 2025SSPO: Self-traced Step-wise Preference Optimization for Process Supervision and Reasoning Compression
  5. 2025Rewarding Structural Conformance of Reasoning using Process Mining
  6. 2025Attention as a Compass: Efficient Exploration for Process-Supervised RL in Reasoning Models
  7. 2026PAPO: Stabilizing Rubric Integration Training via Decoupled Advantage Normalization
  8. 2026GRPO-VPS: Enhancing Group Relative Policy Optimization with Verifiable Process Supervision for Effective Reasoning