Detecting AI-Generated Images via Distributional Deviations from Real Images
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid advancement of generative models has significantly enhanced the quality of AI-generated images, raising concerns about misinformation and the erosion of public trust. Detecting AI-generated images has thus become a critical challenge, particularly in terms of generalizing to unseen generative models. Existing methods using frozen pre-trained CLIP models show promise in generalization but treat the image encoder as a basic feature extractor, failing to fully exploit its potential. In this paper, we perform an in-depth analysis of the frozen CLIP image encoder (CLIP-ViT), revealing that it effectively clusters real images in a high-level, abstract feature space. However, it does not truly possess the ability to distinguish between real and AI-generated images. Based on this analysis, we propose a Masking-based Pre-trained model Fine-Tuning (MPFT) strategy, which introduces a Texture-Aware Masking (TAM) mechanism to mask textured areas containing generative model-specific patterns during fine-tuning. This approach compels CLIP-ViT to attend to the "distributional deviations"from authentic images for AI-generated image detection, thereby achieving enhanced generalization performance. Extensive experiments on the GenImage and UniversalFakeDetect datasets demonstrate that our method, fine-tuned with only a minimal number of images, significantly outperforms existing approaches, achieving up to 98.2% and 94.6% average accuracy on the two datasets, respectively.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2026.
Builds on
30 of 40 references.
References · 30
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
- 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
- 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
- 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 842
- 2020Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Cluescited by 518
- 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 501
- 2023Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Modelscited by 483
- 2023DIRE for Diffusion-Generated Image Detectioncited by 386
18 more
- 2023GenImage: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Detecting AI-Generated Imagecited by 318
- 2019Detecting and Simulating Artifacts in GAN Fake Imagescited by 293
- 2020What makes fake images detectable? Understanding properties that generalizecited by 272
- 2020Global Texture Enhancement for Fake Face Detection in the Wildcited by 220
- 2024A Sanity Check for AI-generated Image Detectioncited by 187
- 2023Forgery-aware Adaptive Transformer for Generalizable Synthetic Image Detectioncited by 180
- 2020GridMask Data Augmentationcited by 123
- 2023Intriguing properties of synthetic images: from generative adversarial networks to diffusion modelscited by 121
- 2023PatchCraft: Exploring Texture Patch for Efficient AI-generated Image Detectioncited by 119
- 2024C2P-CLIP: Injecting Category Common Prompt in CLIP to Enhance Generalization in Deepfake Detectioncited by 111
- 2018ForensicTransfer: Weakly-supervised Domain Adaptation for Forgery Detectioncited by 104
- 2024Leveraging Representations from Intermediate Encoder-blocks for Synthetic Image Detectioncited by 88
- 2022FrePGAN: Robust Deepfake Detection Using Frequency-level Perturbationscited by 75
- 2021BiHPF: Bilateral High-Pass Filters for Robust Deepfake Detectioncited by 60
- 2024CLIPping the Deception: Adapting Vision-Language Models for Universal Deepfake Detectioncited by 47
- 2024LaRE2: Latent Reconstruction Error Based Method for Diffusion-Generated Image Detectioncited by 47
- 2022GLFF: Global and Local Feature Fusion for AI-synthesized Image Detectioncited by 25
- 2024ForgeLens: Data-Efficient Forgery Focus for Generalizable Forgery Image Detectioncited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.