mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

P-Check: Advancing Personalized Reward Model via Learning to Generate Dynamic Checklist

arXiv 2601.02986 ↗First posted 6 Jan 2026cs.CLcited by 5

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent approaches in personalized reward modeling have primarily focused on leveraging user interaction history to align model judgments with individual preferences. However, existing approaches largely treat user context as a static or implicit conditioning signal, failing to capture the dynamic and multi-faceted nature of human judgment. In this paper, we propose P-Check, a novel personalized reward modeling framework, designed to train a plug-and-play checklist generator that synthesizes dynamic evaluation criteria for guiding the reward prediction. To better align these checklists with personalized nuances, we introduce Preference-Contrastive Criterion Weighting, a training strategy that assigns saliency scores to criteria based on their discriminative power for personalized judgment. We conduct extensive experiments and demonstrate that P-Check not only improves reward accuracy but also enhances downstream personalized generation, and remains robust in OOD scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 15 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2026.

Builds on

15 of 52 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference7 Mar
  2. 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Merging17 Oct

Other references · 13

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  3. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  4. 2023Scaling Relationship on Learning Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 427
  5. 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domainscited by 366
  6. 2025Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modelingcited by 239
  7. 2025OpenRubrics: Towards Scalable Synthetic Rubric Generation for Reward Modeling and LLM Alignmentcited by 132
  8. 2025GenPRM: Scaling Test-Time Compute of Process Reward Models via Generative Reasoningcited by 97
  9. 2025NextQuill: Causal Preference Modeling for Enhancing LLM Personalizationcited by 30
  10. 2025StepWiser: Stepwise Generative Judges for Wiser Reasoningcited by 28
  11. 2025Bradley-Terry and Multi-Objective Reward Modeling Are Complementarycited by 11
  12. 2025BESPOKE: Benchmark for Search-Augmented Large Language Model Personalization via Diagnostic Feedbackcited by 7
1 more
  1. 2024Stop Playing the Guessing Game! Target-free User Simulation for Evaluating Conversational Recommender Systemscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Personalized RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models with Human Aligned Personalization
  2. 2026P-GenRM: Personalized Generative Reward Model with Test-time User-based Scaling
  3. 2026Using Context Is Not Enough: Test-Time Training for Personalized Reward Modeling
  4. 2025PersRM-R1: Enhance Personalized Reward Modeling with Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2025Capturing Individual Human Preferences with Reward Features
  6. 2026One Adapts to Any: Meta Reward Modeling for Personalized LLM Alignment
  7. 2025FSPO: Few-Shot Optimization of Synthetic Preferences Personalizes to Real Users
  8. 2024Test-Time Alignment via Hypothesis Reweighting