mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GMTS: Gradient Magnitude-based Token Selection Improves RLVR Training for LLM Reasoning

arXiv 2608.30632 ↗First posted 31 Aug 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning (RL), particularly RL with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), has recently emerged as a central paradigm for enhancing large language models' (LLMs) reasoning abilities, demonstrating remarkable effectiveness across reasoning tasks. Recent studies suggest that high-entropy tokens play an exceptionally important role in model training, since training with only the highest 20% entropy tokens yields significant performance gains. However, why such high-entropy tokens are beneficial remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we find that although high-entropy tokens within one answer tend to correlate with large gradient magnitude, entropy alone fails to consistently reflect token importance across different answers, considering the variations in the answer-level reward signals. Based on this observation, we introduce the Gradient Magnitude-based Token Selection (GMTS) method to quantify token importance, which leverages the entropy-gradient connection to approximate gradient-magnitude rankings for token selection. We find that training on the top 20% tokens ranked by GMTS consistently outperforms entropy-based token selection across three reasoning domains and various model sizes, suggesting that GMTS provides a more fine-grained estimate of token contribution for RLVR training.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 21 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.

Builds on

21 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 14

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Which Tokens Matter? Adaptive Token Selection for RLVR with the Relative Surprisal Index30 Jun
  2. 2026FIPO: Eliciting Deep Reasoning with Future-KL Influenced Policy Optimization20 Mar
  3. 2026GDPO: Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization for Multi-reward RL Optimization8 Jan
  4. 2025Emergent Hierarchical Reasoning in LLMs through Reinforcement Learning3 Sep
  5. 2025CURE: Critical-Token-Guided Re-Concatenation for Entropy-Collapse Prevention14 Aug
  6. 2025GTPO and GRPO-S: Token and Sequence-Level Reward Shaping with Policy Entropy6 Aug
  7. 2025Stabilizing Knowledge, Promoting Reasoning: Dual-Token Constraints for RLVR21 Jul
  8. 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning2 Jun
  9. 2025Diversity-Aware Policy Optimization for Large Language Model Reasoning29 May
  10. 2025The Entropy Mechanism of Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Models28 May
  11. 2025Do Not Let Low-Probability Tokens Over-Dominate in RL for LLMs19 May
  12. 2025SEED-GRPO: Semantic Entropy Enhanced GRPO for Uncertainty-Aware Policy Optimization18 May
2 more
  1. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale18 Mar
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms20 Jul

Other references · 7

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  3. 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 788
  4. 2025VLM-R1: A Stable and Generalizable R1-style Large Vision-Language Modelcited by 515
  5. 2022CommonsenseQA 2.0: Exposing the Limits of AI through Gamificationcited by 108
  6. 2025VisualQuality-R1: Reasoning-Induced Image Quality Assessment via Reinforcement Learning to Rankcited by 77
  7. 2026LLaDA2.1: Speeding Up Text Diffusion via Token Editingcited by 48

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Revisiting Entropy in Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models
  2. 2025Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Semantic and Token Entropy for LLM Reasoning
  3. 2026Not All Tokens Learn Alike: Attention Entropy Reveals Heterogeneous Signals in RL Reasoning
  4. 2025Beyond High-Entropy Exploration: Correctness-Aware Low-Entropy Segment-Based Advantage Shaping for Reasoning LLMs
  5. 2025Diversity or Precision? A Deep Dive into Next Token Prediction
  6. 2025Not All Tokens Matter: Towards Efficient LLM Reasoning via Token Significance in Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2026Rethinking RL for LLM Reasoning: It's Sparse Policy Selection, Not Capability Learning
  8. 2026Beyond Entropy: Learning from Token-Level Distributional Deviations for LLM Reasoning