Rethinking Sample Polarity in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Large reasoning models (LRMs) are typically trained using reinforcement learning with verifiable reward (RLVR) to enhance their reasoning abilities. In this paradigm, policies are updated using both positive and negative self-generated rollouts, which correspond to distinct sample polarities. In this paper, we provide a systematic investigation into how these sample polarities affect RLVR training dynamics and behaviors. We find that positive samples sharpen existing correct reasoning patterns, while negative samples encourage exploration of new reasoning paths. We further explore how adjusting the advantage values of positive and negative samples at both the sample level and the token level affects RLVR training. Based on these insights, we propose an Adaptive and Asymmetric token-level Advantage shaping method for Policy Optimization, namely A3PO, that more precisely allocates advantage signals to key tokens across different polarities. Experiments across five reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.
Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 26 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Dec 2025.
Builds on
26 of 42 references.
Closest ancestors · 13
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Rethinking Entropy Interventions in RLVR: An Entropy Change Perspective11 Oct
- 2025Low-probability Tokens Sustain Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward3 Oct
- 2025A Survey of Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models10 Sep
- 2025Towards High Data Efficiency in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward1 Sep
- 2025TreePO: Bridging the Gap of Policy Optimization and Efficacy and Inference Efficiency with Heuristic Tree-based Modeling24 Aug
- 2025Geometric-Mean Policy Optimization28 Jul
- 2025Dissecting Long-Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Models: An Empirical Study5 Jun
- 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning2 Jun
- 2025The Surprising Effectiveness of Negative Reinforcement in LLM Reasoning2 Jun
- 2025ProRL: Prolonged Reinforcement Learning Expands Reasoning Boundaries in Large Language Models30 May
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?18 Apr
- 2025VAPO: Efficient and Reliable Reinforcement Learning for Advanced Reasoning Tasks7 Apr
1 more
Other references · 13
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
- 2023PyTorch FSDP: Experiences on Scaling Fully Sharded Data Parallelcited by 641
- 2025BAPO: Stabilizing Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning for LLMs via Balanced Policy Optimization with Adaptive Clippingcited by 47
- 2025Unlocking General Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models via Representation Engineeringcited by 34
- 2025Analyzing and Mitigating Object Hallucination: A Training Bias Perspectivecited by 12
- 2024Over-parameterized Student Model via Tensor Decomposition Boosted Knowledge Distillationcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 19.
19 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2026Exploring Reasoning Reward Model for Agentscited by 13
- 2026VESPO: Variational Sequence-Level Soft Policy Optimization for Stable Off-Policy LLM Trainingcited by 9
- 2026Where Hindsight Credit Can Reside: A Signed-Capacity View of Token Updates in RLVRcited by 8
- 2026Overconfident Errors Need Stronger Correction: Asymmetric Confidence Penalties for Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
- 2026On-Policy Supervised Fine-Tuning for Efficient Reasoningcited by 4
- 2026Learning When Not to Act: Mitigating Tool Abuse in Agentic Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
- 2026STARE: Surprisal-Guided Token-Level Advantage Reweighting for Policy Entropy Stabilitycited by 3
- 2026Which Tokens Matter? Adaptive Token Selection for RLVR with the Relative Surprisal Indexcited by 3
- 2026Perceive-to-Reason: Decoupling Perception and Reasoning for Fine-Grained Visual Reasoningcited by 3
- 2026Low-rank Optimization Trajectories Modeling for LLM RLVR Accelerationcited by 2
- 2026The Cancellation Hypothesis in Critic-Free RL: From Outcome Rewards to Token Creditscited by 2
- 2026Entropy Polarity in Reinforcement Fine-Tuning: Direction, Asymmetry, and Controlcited by 2
7 more
- 2026CloDS: Visual-Only Unsupervised Cloth Dynamics Learning in Unknown Conditionscited by 0
- 2026MHPO: Modulated Hazard-aware Policy Optimization for Stable Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026EAPO: Entropy-Driven Adaptive Positive-Negative Sample Weighting for Policy Optimization in Open-Ended QAcited by 0
- 2026RL Post-Training Builds Compositional Reasoning Strategiescited by 0
- 2026Ring-Zero: Scaling Zero RL to a Trillion Parameters for Emergent Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Stable-MM-R1: Anchoring Multimodal Reasoning Dynamics via Entropy-Guided Stratificationcited by 0
- 2026Surprising Success, Repeated Failure: Entropy-Guided Credit Assignment for Exploration in LLM Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Surprising Success, Repeated Failure: Entropy-Guided Credit Assignment for Exploration in LLM Reasoning27 Sep 2026
- 2026Stable-MM-R1: Anchoring Multimodal Reasoning Dynamics via Entropy-Guided Stratification7 Sep 2026
- 2026Ring-Zero: Scaling Zero RL to a Trillion Parameters for Emergent Reasoning14 Jul 2026
- 2026RL Post-Training Builds Compositional Reasoning Strategies8 Jul 2026
- 2026Perceive-to-Reason: Decoupling Perception and Reasoning for Fine-Grained Visual Reasoning1 Jul 2026
- 2026Which Tokens Matter? Adaptive Token Selection for RLVR with the Relative Surprisal Index30 Jun 2026
- 2026STARE: Surprisal-Guided Token-Level Advantage Reweighting for Policy Entropy Stability17 Jun 2026
- 2026Learning When Not to Act: Mitigating Tool Abuse in Agentic Reinforcement Learning1 Jun 2026
- 2026EAPO: Entropy-Driven Adaptive Positive-Negative Sample Weighting for Policy Optimization in Open-Ended QA27 May 2026
- 2026Entropy Polarity in Reinforcement Fine-Tuning: Direction, Asymmetry, and Control12 May 2026
- 2026The Cancellation Hypothesis in Critic-Free RL: From Outcome Rewards to Token Credits9 May 2026
- 2026Low-rank Optimization Trajectories Modeling for LLM RLVR Acceleration13 Apr 2026
7 more
- 2026Where Hindsight Credit Can Reside: A Signed-Capacity View of Token Updates in RLVR13 Apr 2026
- 2026MHPO: Modulated Hazard-aware Policy Optimization for Stable Reinforcement Learning14 Mar 2026
- 2026Overconfident Errors Need Stronger Correction: Asymmetric Confidence Penalties for Reinforcement Learning24 Feb 2026
- 2026On-Policy Supervised Fine-Tuning for Efficient Reasoning13 Feb 2026
- 2026VESPO: Variational Sequence-Level Soft Policy Optimization for Stable Off-Policy LLM Training11 Feb 2026
- 2026CloDS: Visual-Only Unsupervised Cloth Dynamics Learning in Unknown Conditions2 Feb 2026
- 2026Exploring Reasoning Reward Model for Agents29 Jan 2026
- 2026Where Hindsight Credit Can Reside: A Signed-Capacity View of Token Updates in RLVRcited by 8
- 2026Overconfident Errors Need Stronger Correction: Asymmetric Confidence Penalties for Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
- 2026On-Policy Supervised Fine-Tuning for Efficient Reasoningcited by 4
- 2026STARE: Surprisal-Guided Token-Level Advantage Reweighting for Policy Entropy Stabilitycited by 3
- 2026Which Tokens Matter? Adaptive Token Selection for RLVR with the Relative Surprisal Indexcited by 3
- 2026Perceive-to-Reason: Decoupling Perception and Reasoning for Fine-Grained Visual Reasoningcited by 3
- 2026EAPO: Entropy-Driven Adaptive Positive-Negative Sample Weighting for Policy Optimization in Open-Ended QAcited by 0
- 2026Ring-Zero: Scaling Zero RL to a Trillion Parameters for Emergent Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Stable-MM-R1: Anchoring Multimodal Reasoning Dynamics via Entropy-Guided Stratificationcited by 0
- 2026Surprising Success, Repeated Failure: Entropy-Guided Credit Assignment for Exploration in LLM Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Surprising Success, Repeated Failure: Entropy-Guided Credit Assignment for Exploration in LLM Reasoning27 Sep 2026
- 2026Stable-MM-R1: Anchoring Multimodal Reasoning Dynamics via Entropy-Guided Stratification7 Sep 2026
- 2026Ring-Zero: Scaling Zero RL to a Trillion Parameters for Emergent Reasoning14 Jul 2026
- 2026Perceive-to-Reason: Decoupling Perception and Reasoning for Fine-Grained Visual Reasoning1 Jul 2026
- 2026Which Tokens Matter? Adaptive Token Selection for RLVR with the Relative Surprisal Index30 Jun 2026
- 2026STARE: Surprisal-Guided Token-Level Advantage Reweighting for Policy Entropy Stability17 Jun 2026
- 2026EAPO: Entropy-Driven Adaptive Positive-Negative Sample Weighting for Policy Optimization in Open-Ended QA27 May 2026
- 2026Where Hindsight Credit Can Reside: A Signed-Capacity View of Token Updates in RLVR13 Apr 2026
- 2026Overconfident Errors Need Stronger Correction: Asymmetric Confidence Penalties for Reinforcement Learning24 Feb 2026
- 2026On-Policy Supervised Fine-Tuning for Efficient Reasoning13 Feb 2026
- 2026Low-rank Optimization Trajectories Modeling for LLM RLVR Accelerationcited by 2
- 2026The Cancellation Hypothesis in Critic-Free RL: From Outcome Rewards to Token Creditscited by 2
- 2026Entropy Polarity in Reinforcement Fine-Tuning: Direction, Asymmetry, and Controlcited by 2
- 2026CloDS: Visual-Only Unsupervised Cloth Dynamics Learning in Unknown Conditionscited by 0
- 2026MHPO: Modulated Hazard-aware Policy Optimization for Stable Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026RL Post-Training Builds Compositional Reasoning Strategiescited by 0
- 2026RL Post-Training Builds Compositional Reasoning Strategies8 Jul 2026
- 2026Entropy Polarity in Reinforcement Fine-Tuning: Direction, Asymmetry, and Control12 May 2026
- 2026The Cancellation Hypothesis in Critic-Free RL: From Outcome Rewards to Token Credits9 May 2026
- 2026Low-rank Optimization Trajectories Modeling for LLM RLVR Acceleration13 Apr 2026
- 2026MHPO: Modulated Hazard-aware Policy Optimization for Stable Reinforcement Learning14 Mar 2026
- 2026CloDS: Visual-Only Unsupervised Cloth Dynamics Learning in Unknown Conditions2 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025The Reasoning Boundary Paradox: How Reinforcement Learning Constrains Language Models
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs
- 2025Revisiting Entropy in Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models
- 2025Conditional Advantage Estimation for Reinforcement Learning in Large Reasoning Models
- 2025The Debate on RLVR Reasoning Capability Boundary: Shrinkage, Expansion, or Both? A Two-Stage Dynamic View
- 2025TraPO: A Semi-Supervised Reinforcement Learning Framework for Boosting LLM Reasoning
- 2026Rewards as Labels: Revisiting RLVR from a Classification Perspective
- 2026What are Key Factors for Updates in RL for LLM Reasoning?