mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Avoiding the Price of Adaptivity: Inference in Linear Contextual Bandits via Stability

arXiv 2512.20368 ↗First posted 23 Dec 2025stat.ML cs.IT cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Statistical inference in contextual bandits is challenging due to the adaptive, non-i.i.d. nature of the data. A growing body of work shows that classical least-squares inference can fail under adaptive sampling, and that valid confidence intervals for linear functionals typically require an inflation of order √d log T. This phenomenon -- often termed the price of adaptivity -- reflects the intrinsic difficulty of reliable inference under general contextual bandit policies. A key structural condition that overcomes this limitation is the stability condition of Lai and Wei, which requires the empirical feature covariance to converge to a deterministic limit. When stability holds, the ordinary least-squares estimator satisfies a central limit theorem, and classical Wald-type confidence intervals remain asymptotically valid under adaptation, without incurring the √d log T price of adaptivity. In this paper, we propose and analyze a regularized EXP4 algorithm for linear contextual bandits. Our first main result shows that this procedure satisfies the Lai--Wei stability condition and therefore admits valid Wald-type confidence intervals for linear functionals. We additionally provide quantitative rates of convergence in the associated central limit theorem. Our second result establishes that the same algorithm achieves regret guarantees that are minimax optimal up to logarithmic factors, demonstrating that stability and statistical efficiency can coexist within a single contextual bandit method. As an application of our theory, we show how it can be used to construct confidence intervals for the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) under adaptively collected data. Finally, we complement our theory with simulations illustrating the empirical normality of the resulting estimators and the sharpness of the corresponding confidence intervals.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Dec 2025.

Builds on

28 of 46 references.

References · 28

  1. 2018Tsallis-INF: An Optimal Algorithm for Stochastic and Adversarial Banditscited by 123
  2. 2018More Adaptive Algorithms for Adversarial Banditscited by 114
  3. 2015Multi-armed Bandit Models for the Optimal Design of Clinical Trials: Benefits and Challengescited by 113
  4. 2019Confidence Intervals for Policy Evaluation in Adaptive Experimentscited by 95
  5. 2020Inference for Batched Banditscited by 63
  6. 2017Accurate Inference for Adaptive Linear Modelscited by 39
  7. 2022Anytime-valid off-policy inference for contextual banditscited by 37
  8. 2017Why Adaptively Collected Data Have Negative Bias and How to Correct for Itcited by 36
  9. 2021A Closer Look at the Worst-case Behavior of Multi-armed Bandit Algorithmscited by 29
  10. 2017Sparsity, variance and curvature in multi-armed banditscited by 24
  11. 2019On the bias, risk and consistency of sample means in multi-armed banditscited by 24
  12. 2019Are sample means in multi-armed bandits positively or negatively biased?cited by 24
16 more
  1. 2021Near-optimal inference in adaptive linear regressioncited by 20
  2. 2024UCB algorithms for multi-armed bandits: Precise regret and adaptive inferencecited by 16
  3. 2021Improved Analysis of the Tsallis-INF Algorithm in Stochastically Constrained Adversarial Bandits and Stochastic Bandits with Adversarial Corruptionscited by 15
  4. 2022Double Doubly Robust Thompson Sampling for Generalized Linear Contextual Banditscited by 14
  5. 2019Online Debiasing for Adaptively Collected High-dimensional Data with Applications to Time Series Analysiscited by 13
  6. 2021Open Problem: Tight Online Confidence Intervals for RKHS Elementscited by 13
  7. 2022Statistical Inference After Adaptive Sampling for Longitudinal Datacited by 11
  8. 2022The Typical Behavior of Bandit Algorithmscited by 10
  9. 2024Inference with the Upper Confidence Bound Algorithmcited by 9
  10. 2023Randomization Tests for Adaptively Collected Datacited by 7
  11. 2025Stable Thompson Sampling: Valid Inference via Variance Inflationcited by 6
  12. 2025Statistical Inference under Adaptive Sampling with LinUCBcited by 6
  13. 2024Allocation Stability and Wald Inference under Variance-Aware UCBcited by 4
  14. 2021Debiasing Samples from Online Learning Using Bootstrapcited by 3
  15. 2025Adaptive Off-Policy Inference for M-Estimators Under Model Misspecificationcited by 3
  16. 2025On Instability of Minimax Optimal Optimism-Based Bandit Algorithmscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.