mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Typical Behavior of Bandit Algorithms

arXiv 2210.05660 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2022cs.LG math.ST stat.THcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We establish strong laws of large numbers and central limit theorems for the regret of two of the most popular bandit algorithms: Thompson sampling and UCB. Here, our characterizations of the regret distribution complement the characterizations of the tail of the regret distribution recently developed by Fan and Glynn (2021) (arXiv:2109.13595). The tail characterizations there are associated with atypical bandit behavior on trajectories where the optimal arm mean is under-estimated, leading to mis-identification of the optimal arm and large regret. In contrast, our SLLN's and CLT's here describe the typical behavior and fluctuation of regret on trajectories where the optimal arm mean is properly estimated. We find that Thompson sampling and UCB satisfy the same SLLN and CLT, with the asymptotics of both the SLLN and the (mean) centering sequence in the CLT matching the asymptotics of expected regret. Both the mean and variance in the CLT grow at log(T) rates with the time horizon T. Asymptotically as T → ∞, the variability in the number of plays of each sub-optimal arm depends only on the rewards received for that arm, which indicates that each sub-optimal arm contributes independently to the overall CLT variance.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2022.

Builds on

3 of 15 references.

References · 3

  1. 2013Thompson Sampling for 1-Dimensional Exponential Family Banditscited by 41
  2. 2021A Closer Look at the Worst-case Behavior of Multi-armed Bandit Algorithmscited by 29
  3. 2021Diffusion Approximations for Thompson Sampling in the Small Gap Regimecited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 6.

10 papers.