mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Closer Look at the Worst-case Behavior of Multi-armed Bandit Algorithms

arXiv 2106.02126 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 29

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

One of the key drivers of complexity in the classical (stochastic) multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem is the difference between mean rewards in the top two arms, also known as the instance gap. The celebrated Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) policy is among the simplest optimism-based MAB algorithms that naturally adapts to this gap: for a horizon of play n, it achieves optimal O(log n) regret in instances with "large" gaps, and a near-optimal O(√n log n) minimax regret when the gap can be arbitrarily "small." This paper provides new results on the arm-sampling behavior of UCB, leading to several important insights. Among these, it is shown that arm-sampling rates under UCB are asymptotically deterministic, regardless of the problem complexity. This discovery facilitates new sharp asymptotics and a novel alternative proof for the O(√n log n) minimax regret of UCB. Furthermore, the paper also provides the first complete process-level characterization of the MAB problem under UCB in the conventional diffusion scaling. Among other things, the "small" gap worst-case lens adopted in this paper also reveals profound distinctions between the behavior of UCB and Thompson Sampling, such as an "incomplete learning" phenomenon characteristic of the latter.

Key facts. Cited by 29 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2021.

Builds on

14 of 46 references.

References · 14

  1. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  2. 2014On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Modelscited by 280
  3. 2015Multi-armed Bandit Models for the Optimal Design of Clinical Trials: Benefits and Challengescited by 113
  4. 2019Confidence Intervals for Policy Evaluation in Adaptive Experimentscited by 95
  5. 2020Inference for Batched Banditscited by 63
  6. 2016On Explore-Then-Commit Strategiescited by 46
  7. 2017Accurate Inference for Adaptive Linear Modelscited by 39
  8. 2019On the bias, risk and consistency of sample means in multi-armed banditscited by 24
  9. 2019Are sample means in multi-armed bandits positively or negatively biased?cited by 24
  10. 2021Diffusion Approximations for Thompson Sampling in the Small Gap Regimecited by 12
  11. 2020On conditional versus marginal bias in multi-armed banditscited by 9
  12. 2021From Finite to Countable-Armed Banditscited by 8
2 more
  1. 2021Diffusion Approximations for a Class of Sequential Testing Problemscited by 7
  2. 2020Asymptotic Convergence of Thompson Samplingcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 6; 2024: 7; 2025: 4; 2026: 7.

29 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2024UCB algorithms for multi-armed bandits: Precise regret and adaptive inferencecited by 16
  2. 2021The Fragility of Optimized Bandit Algorithmscited by 15
  3. 2022The Typical Behavior of Bandit Algorithmscited by 10
  4. 2024Inference with the Upper Confidence Bound Algorithmcited by 9
  5. 2023Regret Distribution in Stochastic Bandits: Optimal Trade-off between Expectation and Tail Riskcited by 7
  6. 2021Risk and optimal policies in bandit experimentscited by 6
  7. 2024reBandit: Random Effects based Online RL algorithm for Reducing Cannabis Usecited by 6
  8. 2025Stable Thompson Sampling: Valid Inference via Variance Inflationcited by 6
  9. 2024Allocation Stability and Wald Inference under Variance-Aware UCBcited by 4
  10. 2023Adaptive Experimentation at Scale: A Computational Framework for Flexible Batchescited by 2
  11. 2024MiWaves Reinforcement Learning Algorithmcited by 2
  12. 2025A characterization of sample adaptivity in UCB datacited by 2
17 more
  1. 2025Avoiding the Price of Adaptivity: Inference in Linear Contextual Bandits via Stabilitycited by 2
  2. 2026Optimism Stabilizes Thompson Sampling for Adaptive Inferencecited by 2
  3. 2026Bandit Allocational Instabilitycited by 2
  4. 2022Some performance considerations when using multi-armed bandit algorithms in the presence of missing datacited by 1
  5. 2022Risk Preferences of Learning Algorithmscited by 1
  6. 2024Oralytics Reinforcement Learning Algorithmcited by 1
  7. 2026Efficient Inference after Directionally Stable Adaptive Experimentscited by 1
  8. 2026Design Experiments to Compare Multi-armed Bandit Algorithmscited by 1
  9. 2023Complexity Analysis of a Countable-armed Bandit Problemcited by 0
  10. 2023Reward Teaching for Federated Multi-armed Banditscited by 0
  11. 2023Generalized Regret Analysis of Thompson Sampling using Fractional Posteriorscited by 0
  12. 2023Zero-Inflated Banditscited by 0
  13. 2024Reciprocal Learningcited by 0
  14. 2025Conformal bandits: bringing statistical validity and reward efficiency under weak arm separabilitycited by 0
  15. 2026Regret Tail Characterization of Optimal Bandit Algorithms with Generic Rewardscited by 0
  16. 2026MINTS: Minimalist Thompson Samplingcited by 0
  17. 2026Toward the Optimal Regret-Instability Trade-off in Multi-Armed Banditscited by 0