Debiasing Samples from Online Learning Using Bootstrap
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It has been recently shown in the literature that the sample averages from online learning experiments are biased when used to estimate the mean reward. To correct the bias, off-policy evaluation methods, including importance sampling and doubly robust estimators, typically calculate the conditional propensity score, which is ill-defined for non-randomized policies such as UCB. This paper provides a procedure to debias the samples using bootstrap, which doesn't require the knowledge of the reward distribution and can be applied to any adaptive policies. Numerical experiments demonstrate the effective bias reduction for samples generated by popular multi-armed bandit algorithms such as Explore-Then-Commit (ETC), UCB, Thompson sampling (TS) and ε-greedy (EG). We analyze and provide theoretical justifications for the procedure under the ETC algorithm, including the asymptotic convergence of the bias decay rate in the real and bootstrap worlds.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2021.
Builds on
22 of 57 references.
References · 22
- 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 420
- 2015Doubly Robust Off-policy Value Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 337
- 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 246
- 2018More Robust Doubly Robust Off-policy Evaluationcited by 141
- 2015Multi-armed Bandit Models for the Optimal Design of Clinical Trials: Benefits and Challengescited by 113
- 2019Confidence Intervals for Policy Evaluation in Adaptive Experimentscited by 95
- 2015Bootstrapped Thompson Sampling and Deep Explorationcited by 40
- 2017Accurate Inference for Adaptive Linear Modelscited by 39
- 2017Why Adaptively Collected Data Have Negative Bias and How to Correct for Itcited by 36
- 2019Bootstrapping Upper Confidence Boundcited by 36
- 2018Garbage In, Reward Out: Bootstrapping Exploration in Multi-Armed Banditscited by 33
- 2019On Multi-Armed Bandit Designs for Dose-Finding Clinical Trialscited by 32
10 more
- 2020Statistical Bootstrapping for Uncertainty Estimation in Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 28
- 2019On the bias, risk and consistency of sample means in multi-armed banditscited by 24
- 2019Are sample means in multi-armed bandits positively or negatively biased?cited by 24
- 2017Estimation Considerations in Contextual Banditscited by 22
- 2018Mitigating Bias in Adaptive Data Gathering via Differential Privacycited by 21
- 2014Thompson sampling with the online bootstrapcited by 19
- 2015A Survey of Online Experiment Design with the Stochastic Multi-Armed Banditcited by 18
- 2019More Efficient Off-Policy Evaluation through Regularized Targeted Learningcited by 17
- 2018New Insights into Bootstrapping for Banditscited by 6
- 2014Improving offline evaluation of contextual bandit algorithms via bootstrapping techniquescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.