Agile Flight Emerges from Multi-Agent Competitive Racing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Through multi-agent competition and the sparse high-level objective of winning a race, we find that both agile flight (e.g., high-speed motion pushing the platform to its physical limits) and strategy (e.g., overtaking or blocking) emerge from agents trained with reinforcement learning. We provide evidence in both simulation and the real world that this approach outperforms the common paradigm of training agents in isolation with rewards that prescribe behavior, e.g., progress on the raceline, in particular when the complexity of the environment increases, e.g., in the presence of obstacles. Moreover, we find that multi-agent competition yields policies that transfer more reliably to the real world than policies trained with a single-agent progress-based reward, despite the two methods using the same simulation environment, randomization strategy, and hardware. In addition to improved sim-to-real transfer, the multi-agent policies also exhibit some degree of generalization to opponents unseen at training time. Overall, our work, following in the tradition of multi-agent competitive game-play in digital domains, shows that sparse task-level rewards are sufficient for training agents capable of advanced low-level control in the physical world. Code: https://github.com/Jirl-upenn/AgileFlight_MultiAgent
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2025.
Builds on
23 of 31 references.
References · 23
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 942
- 2023Orbit: A Unified Simulation Framework for Interactive Robot Learning Environmentscited by 295
- 2018Human-level performance in first-person multiplayer games with population-based deep reinforcement learningcited by 264
- 2023Reaching the Limit in Autonomous Racing: Optimal Control versus Reinforcement Learningcited by 111
- 2025Robust Autonomy Emerges from Self-Playcited by 67
- 2019Emergent Coordination Through Competitioncited by 57
- 2023Autonomous Drone Racing: A Surveycited by 35
- 2021A learning agent that acquires social norms from public sanctions in decentralized multi-agent settingscited by 24
- 2021Time-Optimal Planning for Quadrotor Waypoint Flightcited by 23
- 2018A Real-Time Game Theoretic Planner for Autonomous Two-Player Drone Racingcited by 21
- 2021Model Predictive Contouring Control for Time-Optimal Quadrotor Flightcited by 21
11 more
- 2023End-to-end Reinforcement Learning for Time-Optimal Quadcopter Flightcited by 17
- 2024A Learning-based Quadcopter Controller with Extreme Adaptationcited by 17
- 2023End-to-end Neural Network Based Quadcopter controlcited by 11
- 2022Time-Optimal Online Replanning for Agile Quadrotor Flightcited by 8
- 2025One Net to Rule Them All: Domain Randomization in Quadcopter Racing Across Different Platformscited by 7
- 2024Dashing for the Golden Snitch: Multi-Drone Time-Optimal Motion Planning with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
- 2025Leveling the Playing Field: Carefully Comparing Classical and Learned Controllers for Quadrotor Trajectory Trackingcited by 6
- 2018Adversarial Domain Randomizationcited by 5
- 2025A Champion-level Vision-based Reinforcement Learning Agent for Competitive Racing in Gran Turismo 7cited by 4
- 2024Gate-Aware Online Planning for Two-Player Autonomous Drone Racingcited by 1
- 2025Non-Normalized Solutions of Generalized Nash Equilibrium in Autonomous Racingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Superhuman Safe and Agile Racing through Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026AI Coaching for Accelerating Human Skill Development with Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Learning Robot Policies from Sparse Success Signals via STL-Guided Stein Variational Policy Gradientcited by 0
- 2026Battery-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Aggressive Quadrotor Flightcited by 0
- 2026Battery-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Aggressive Quadrotor Flight29 Sep 2026
- 2026Learning Robot Policies from Sparse Success Signals via STL-Guided Stein Variational Policy Gradient25 Sep 2026
- 2026AI Coaching for Accelerating Human Skill Development with Reinforcement Learning24 Jun 2026
- 2026Superhuman Safe and Agile Racing through Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning21 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Intercepting an Agile Target with Net-Carrying Drones using Competitive Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning ↗
- 2023Mimicking To Dominate: Imitation Learning Strategies for Success in Multiagent Competitive Games
- 2026Learning-based Multi-agent Race Strategies in Formula 1
- 2025Curriculum-Based Iterative Self-Play for Scalable Multi-Drone Racing
- 2025Overcoming Environmental Meta-Stationarity in MARL via Adaptive Curriculum and Counterfactual Group Advantage
- 2024FightLadder: A Benchmark for Competitive Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Bridging Performance and Generalization in Reinforcement Learning for Agile Flight
- 2025IPPO Learns the Game, Not the Team: A Study on Generalization in Heterogeneous Agent Teams