Credal and Interval Deep Evidential Classifications
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) presents a pivotal challenge in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI), profoundly impacting decision-making, risk assessment and model reliability. In this paper, we introduce Credal and Interval Deep Evidential Classifications (CDEC and IDEC, respectively) as novel approaches to address UQ in classification tasks. CDEC and IDEC leverage a credal set (closed and convex set of probabilities) and an interval of evidential predictive distributions, respectively, allowing us to avoid overfitting to the training data and to systematically assess both epistemic (reducible) and aleatoric (irreducible) uncertainties. When those surpass acceptable thresholds, CDEC and IDEC have the capability to abstain from classification and flag an excess of epistemic or aleatoric uncertainty, as relevant. Conversely, within acceptable uncertainty bounds, CDEC and IDEC provide a collection of labels with robust probabilistic guarantees. CDEC and IDEC are trained using standard backpropagation and a loss function that draws from the theory of evidence. They overcome the shortcomings of previous efforts, and extend the current evidential deep learning literature. Through extensive experiments on MNIST, CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, together with their natural OoD shifts (F-MNIST/K-MNIST, SVHN/Intel, TinyImageNet), we show that CDEC and IDEC achieve competitive predictive accuracy, state-of-the-art OoD detection under epistemic and total uncertainty, and tight, well-calibrated prediction regions that expand reliably under distribution shift. An ablation over ensemble size further demonstrates that CDEC attains stable uncertainty estimates with only a small ensemble.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2025.
Builds on
25 of 78 references.
References · 25
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,320
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,328
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,340
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,163
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 910
- 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 418
- 2020Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Userscited by 337
- 2020Puzzle Mix: Exploiting Saliency and Local Statistics for Optimal Mixupcited by 261
- 2018Understanding Measures of Uncertainty for Adversarial Example Detectioncited by 177
- 2020Posterior Network: Uncertainty Estimation without OOD Samples via Density-Based Pseudo-Countscited by 164
- 2021Prior and Posterior Networks: A Survey on Evidential Deep Learning Methods For Uncertainty Estimationcited by 71
- 2022Pitfalls of Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification through Loss Minimisationcited by 66
13 more
- 2016On the Safety of Machine Learning: Cyber-Physical Systems, Decision Sciences, and Data Productscited by 52
- 2023Is the Volume of a Credal Set a Good Measure for Epistemic Uncertainty?cited by 40
- 2024Is Epistemic Uncertainty Faithfully Represented by Evidential Deep Learning Methods?cited by 35
- 2021AutoDEUQ: Automated Deep Ensemble with Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 31
- 2023Learn to Accumulate Evidence from All Training Samples: Theory and Practicecited by 28
- 2016Engineering Safety in Machine Learningcited by 24
- 2024Credal Two-Sample Tests of Epistemic Uncertaintycited by 16
- 2023A Novel Bayes' Theorem for Upper Probabilitiescited by 13
- 2025Integral Imprecise Probability Metricscited by 11
- 2021Kronecker-factored Quasi-Newton Methods for Deep Learningcited by 6
- 2022An Evidential Neural Network Model for Regression Based on Random Fuzzy Numberscited by 6
- 2023Using Semantic Information for Defining and Detecting OOD Inputscited by 6
- 2020Generalized mixtures of finite mixtures and telescoping samplingcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.
8 papers.
- 2026Random-Set Graph Neural Networkscited by 3
- 2026Statistical inference with belief functions: A surveycited by 2
- 2026Credal Large Language Models for Semantic Commitment under Uncertaintycited by 2
- 2026Structured Credal Learningcited by 1
- 2026What Intermediate Layers Know: Detecting Jailbreaks from Entropy Dynamicscited by 1
- 2026Upper Entropy for 2-Monotone Lower Probabilitiescited by 0
- 2026Ensemble-Based Dirichlet Modeling for Predictive Uncertainty and Selective Classificationcited by 0
- 2026XU-RS: Explaining Credal Width in Random-Set Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026XU-RS: Explaining Credal Width in Random-Set Language Models29 Sep 2026
- 2026Credal Large Language Models for Semantic Commitment under Uncertainty24 Aug 2026
- 2026What Intermediate Layers Know: Detecting Jailbreaks from Entropy Dynamics23 Jun 2026
- 2026Random-Set Graph Neural Networks12 May 2026
- 2026Statistical inference with belief functions: A survey8 May 2026
- 2026Ensemble-Based Dirichlet Modeling for Predictive Uncertainty and Selective Classification7 Apr 2026
- 2026Upper Entropy for 2-Monotone Lower Probabilities23 Mar 2026
- 2026Structured Credal Learning14 Mar 2026