A Safety and Security Framework for Real-World Agentic Systems
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper introduces a dynamic and actionable framework for securing agentic AI systems in enterprise deployment. We contend that safety and security are not merely fixed attributes of individual models but also emergent properties arising from the dynamic interactions among models, orchestrators, tools, and data within their operating environments. We propose a new way of identification of novel agentic risks through the lens of user safety. Although, for traditional LLMs and agentic models in isolation, safety and security has a clear separation, through the lens of safety in agentic systems, they appear to be connected. Building on this foundation, we define an operational agentic risk taxonomy that unifies traditional safety and security concerns with novel, uniquely agentic risks, including tool misuse, cascading action chains, and unintended control amplification among others. At the core of our approach is a dynamic agentic safety and security framework that operationalizes contextual agentic risk management by using auxiliary AI models and agents, with human oversight, to assist in contextual risk discovery, evaluation, and mitigation. We further address one of the most challenging aspects of safety and security of agentic systems: risk discovery through sandboxed, AI-driven red teaming. We demonstrate the framework effectiveness through a detailed case study of NVIDIA flagship agentic research assistant, AI-Q Research Assistant, showcasing practical, end-to-end safety and security evaluations in complex, enterprise-grade agentic workflows. This risk discovery phase finds novel agentic risks that are then contextually mitigated. We also release the dataset from our case study, containing traces of over 10,000 realistic attack and defense executions of the agentic workflow to help advance research in agentic safety.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 11 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Nov 2025.
Builds on
11 of 30 references.
References · 11
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
- 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automaticallycited by 619
- 2024Against The Achilles' Heel: A Survey on Red Teaming for Generative Modelscited by 55
- 2024garak: A Framework for Security Probing Large Language Modelscited by 48
- 2025An Approach to Technical AGI Safety and Securitycited by 42
- 2025Lessons from Defending Gemini Against Indirect Prompt Injectionscited by 40
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 11.
11 papers.
- 2026AgentDoG 1.5: A Lightweight and Scalable Alignment Framework for AI Agent Safety and Securitycited by 7
- 2026Self-Evolving Agents as Dynamic Graph Transformation: A Survey and New Perspectivecited by 4
- 2026When Child Inherits: Modeling and Exploiting Subagent Spawn in Multi-Agent Networkscited by 2
- 2026The Authorization-Execution Gap Is a Major Safety and Security Problem in Open-World Agentscited by 2
- 2026MCP-DPT: A Defense-Placement Taxonomy and Coverage Analysis for Model Context Protocol Securitycited by 1
- 2026S3: Improving Agent Safety through Multi-Stage Defensecited by 1
- 2026RIFT-Bench: Dynamic Red-teaming For Agentic AI Systemscited by 0
- 2026Unaccountable Delegation, Fading Skills: Mapping the Risks of Workplace AI Agentscited by 0
- 2026Testing and Evaluation of Agentic AI Systems In Military Command and Controlcited by 0
- 2026PASTABench: Proactive Assessment of Sequential Trajectories for Agent Safetycited by 0
- 2026PROACT-Agent: Progressive Runtime Oversight and Active Circuit-breaking for Real-Time Safetycited by 0
- 2026PROACT-Agent: Progressive Runtime Oversight and Active Circuit-breaking for Real-Time Safety28 Sep 2026
- 2026PASTABench: Proactive Assessment of Sequential Trajectories for Agent Safety23 Sep 2026
- 2026Testing and Evaluation of Agentic AI Systems In Military Command and Control20 Aug 2026
- 2026Unaccountable Delegation, Fading Skills: Mapping the Risks of Workplace AI Agents9 Aug 2026
- 2026S3: Improving Agent Safety through Multi-Stage Defense3 Aug 2026
- 2026RIFT-Bench: Dynamic Red-teaming For Agentic AI Systems22 Jun 2026
- 2026Self-Evolving Agents as Dynamic Graph Transformation: A Survey and New Perspective10 Jun 2026
- 2026AgentDoG 1.5: A Lightweight and Scalable Alignment Framework for AI Agent Safety and Security28 May 2026
- 2026The Authorization-Execution Gap Is a Major Safety and Security Problem in Open-World Agents10 May 2026
- 2026When Child Inherits: Modeling and Exploiting Subagent Spawn in Multi-Agent Networks8 May 2026
- 2026MCP-DPT: A Defense-Placement Taxonomy and Coverage Analysis for Model Context Protocol Security8 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Systems Security Foundations for Agentic Computing
- 2025Agentic AI Security: Threats, Defenses, Evaluation, and Open Challenges
- 2025Toward a Safe Internet of Agents
- 2024Safeguarding AI Agents: Developing and Analyzing Safety Architectures
- 2026SafeAgent: A Runtime Protection Architecture for Agentic Systems
- 2025AgentGuard: Repurposing Agentic Orchestrator for Safety Evaluation of Tool Orchestration
- 2026Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security
- 2026Securing Agentic AI: From Per-Action Checks to Trajectory Assurance