mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Safety and Security Framework for Real-World Agentic Systems

arXiv 2511.21990 ↗First posted 27 Nov 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 11

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper introduces a dynamic and actionable framework for securing agentic AI systems in enterprise deployment. We contend that safety and security are not merely fixed attributes of individual models but also emergent properties arising from the dynamic interactions among models, orchestrators, tools, and data within their operating environments. We propose a new way of identification of novel agentic risks through the lens of user safety. Although, for traditional LLMs and agentic models in isolation, safety and security has a clear separation, through the lens of safety in agentic systems, they appear to be connected. Building on this foundation, we define an operational agentic risk taxonomy that unifies traditional safety and security concerns with novel, uniquely agentic risks, including tool misuse, cascading action chains, and unintended control amplification among others. At the core of our approach is a dynamic agentic safety and security framework that operationalizes contextual agentic risk management by using auxiliary AI models and agents, with human oversight, to assist in contextual risk discovery, evaluation, and mitigation. We further address one of the most challenging aspects of safety and security of agentic systems: risk discovery through sandboxed, AI-driven red teaming. We demonstrate the framework effectiveness through a detailed case study of NVIDIA flagship agentic research assistant, AI-Q Research Assistant, showcasing practical, end-to-end safety and security evaluations in complex, enterprise-grade agentic workflows. This risk discovery phase finds novel agentic risks that are then contextually mitigated. We also release the dataset from our case study, containing traces of over 10,000 realistic attack and defense executions of the agentic workflow to help advance research in agentic safety.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 11 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Nov 2025.

Builds on

11 of 30 references.

References · 11

  1. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  2. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
  3. 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
  4. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
  5. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  6. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
  7. 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automaticallycited by 619
  8. 2024Against The Achilles' Heel: A Survey on Red Teaming for Generative Modelscited by 55
  9. 2024garak: A Framework for Security Probing Large Language Modelscited by 48
  10. 2025An Approach to Technical AGI Safety and Securitycited by 42
  11. 2025Lessons from Defending Gemini Against Indirect Prompt Injectionscited by 40

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 11.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Systems Security Foundations for Agentic Computing
  2. 2025Agentic AI Security: Threats, Defenses, Evaluation, and Open Challenges
  3. 2025Toward a Safe Internet of Agents
  4. 2024Safeguarding AI Agents: Developing and Analyzing Safety Architectures
  5. 2026SafeAgent: A Runtime Protection Architecture for Agentic Systems
  6. 2025AgentGuard: Repurposing Agentic Orchestrator for Safety Evaluation of Tool Orchestration
  7. 2026Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security
  8. 2026Securing Agentic AI: From Per-Action Checks to Trajectory Assurance