Safeguarding AI Agents: Developing and Analyzing Safety Architectures
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
AI agents, specifically powered by large language models, have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in various applications where precision and efficacy are necessary. However, these agents come with inherent risks, including the potential for unsafe or biased actions, vulnerability to adversarial attacks, lack of transparency, and tendency to generate hallucinations. As AI agents become more prevalent in critical sectors of the industry, the implementation of effective safety protocols becomes increasingly important. This paper addresses the critical need for safety measures in AI systems, especially ones that collaborate with human teams. We propose and evaluate three frameworks to enhance safety protocols in AI agent systems: an LLM-powered input-output filter, a safety agent integrated within the system, and a hierarchical delegation-based system with embedded safety checks. Our methodology involves implementing these frameworks and testing them against a set of unsafe agentic use cases, providing a comprehensive evaluation of their effectiveness in mitigating risks associated with AI agent deployment. We conclude that these frameworks can significantly strengthen the safety and security of AI agent systems, minimizing potential harmful actions or outputs. Our work contributes to the ongoing effort to create safe and reliable AI applications, particularly in automated operations, and provides a foundation for developing robust guardrails to ensure the responsible use of AI agents in real-world applications.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 11 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2024.
Builds on
11 of 28 references.
References · 11
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,207
- 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challengescited by 769
- 2023ToxicChat: Unveiling Hidden Challenges of Toxicity Detection in Real-World User-AI Conversationcited by 231
- 2018The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigationcited by 165
- 2024LLM Multi-Agent Systems: Challenges and Open Problemscited by 120
- 2024Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systemscited by 96
- 2024Visibility into AI Agentscited by 79
- 2020AI safety: state of the field through quantitative lenscited by 9
- 2024Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0: A Review of Integration Challenges for Industrial Systemscited by 5
- 2022The Human Factor in AI Safetycited by 1
- 2022The Concept of Criticality in AI Safetycited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026SafePro: Evaluating the Safety of Professional-Level AI Agents
- 2025A Safety and Security Framework for Real-World Agentic Systems
- 2024Concept-Guided LLM Agents for Human-AI Safety Codesign
- 2025VeriGuard: Enhancing LLM Agent Safety via Verified Code Generation
- 2026Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security
- 2026Agent Safety Should Be a Runtime Contract
- 2026SafeAgent: A Runtime Protection Architecture for Agentic Systems
- 2026Taxonomy and Consistency Analysis of Safety Benchmarks for AI Agents