mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

S3: Improving Agent Safety through Multi-Stage Defense

arXiv 2608.02683 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Model (LLM) agents rely on multi-stage agentic workflows, with stages such as memory, planning, and tool execution, to accomplish complex tasks. However, risks may emerge at different stages, propagate across steps, and become difficult to detect and mitigate. Existing safety methods protect only isolated stages and are difficult to integrate, leaving agents without comprehensive protection throughout the workflow. To address these limitations, we introduce Stage-Specific Safety Skills, a unified abstraction that represents heterogeneous safety designs as reusable and composable components with explicit stage semantics. We further develop an automated transformation pipeline that converts existing safety designs into reusable safety skills and establish a community-driven safety skill library. Building on this abstraction, we propose S3, a multi-stage defense framework in which a guard agent orchestrates stage-specific safety skills for risk detection and mitigation throughout the agentic workflow. We also construct the Multi-Stage Risk Benchmark (MSRB) to evaluate representative risks across workflow stages. Experimental results show that S3 consistently outperforms representative state-of-the-art baselines in both safety effectiveness and utility preservation. These results demonstrate the potential of stage-specific safety skills as a scalable and composable foundation for building resilient and trustworthy agent systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 14 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.

Builds on

14 of 20 references.

Closest ancestors · 12

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026SafeHarness: Lifecycle-Integrated Security Architecture for LLM-based Agent Deployment15 Apr
  2. 2026SafeClaw-R: Towards Safe and Secure Multi-Agent Personal Assistants28 Mar
  3. 2026AIR: Improving Agent Safety through Incident Response12 Feb
  4. 2026Agent Skills in the Wild: An Empirical Study of Security Vulnerabilities at Scale15 Jan
  5. 2026Memory Poisoning Attack and Defense on Memory Based LLM-Agents9 Jan
  6. 2025A Safety and Security Framework for Real-World Agentic Systems27 Nov
  7. 2025Agentic AI Security: Threats, Defenses, Evaluation, and Open Challenges27 Oct
  8. 2025A-MemGuard: A Proactive Defense Framework for LLM-Based Agent Memory29 Sep
  9. 2025LlamaFirewall: An open source guardrail system for building secure AI agents6 May
  10. 2025AgentSpec: Customizable Runtime Enforcement for Safe and Reliable LLM Agents24 Mar
  11. 2024SafeAgentBench: A Benchmark for Safe Task Planning of Embodied LLM Agents17 Dec
  12. 2024Agent Security Bench (ASB): Formalizing and Benchmarking Attacks and Defenses in LLM-based Agents3 Oct

Other references · 2

  1. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  2. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Risky-Bench: Probing Agentic Safety Risks under Real-World Deployment
  2. 2026SafeAgent: A Runtime Protection Architecture for Agentic Systems
  3. 2024Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agents
  4. 2025AgentGuard: Repurposing Agentic Orchestrator for Safety Evaluation of Tool Orchestration
  5. 2025AgentAlign: Navigating Safety Alignment in the Shift from Informative to Agentic Large Language Models
  6. 2025SafetyFlow: An Agent-Flow System for Automated LLM Safety Benchmarking
  7. 2026AgentS4D: Benchmarking Runtime Risks across the Execution Lifecycle of LLM-Based Workspace Agents
  8. 2026SHE: Trajectory-driven Safety Harness Evolution for LLM Agents