RoParQ: Paraphrase-Aware Alignment of Large Language Models Towards Robustness to Paraphrased Questions
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) often exhibit inconsistent behavior when answering paraphrased questions, suggesting a reliance on surface-level patterns rather than true semantic understanding. To address this limitation, we introduce RoParQ, a benchmark specifically constructed to evaluate cross-paraphrase consistency in closed-book multiple-choice QA. This benchmark is derived from standard datasets by generating paraphrases via proprietary models and selectively retaining examples that elicit inconsistent confidence from a judge model. We further propose XParaCon, a novel evaluation metric that quantifies a model's robustness by measuring the standard deviation of accuracies across question variants. Additionally, we implement a reasoning-based, paraphrase-aware Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) strategy designed to align models toward semantic invariance. Our experiments demonstrate that this targeted alignment significantly enhances robustness. Notably, fine-tuned lightweight models achieved consistency levels comparable to much larger pre-trained models. These results highlight the efficacy of our approach in mitigating superficial memorization and fostering more robust, reliable LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 6 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2025.
Builds on
6 of 22 references.
References · 6
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
- 2023Rephrase and Respond: Let Large Language Models Ask Better Questions for Themselvescited by 123
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Are We Evaluating Knowledge or Phrasing? Mitigating MCQA Sensitivity with ParaEvalcited by 1
- 2026Same Question, Different Answers: Evaluating LLM Reliability Beyond Accuracycited by 1
- 2026Test-Time Augmentation for LLMs: When Input Diversity Beats Output Diversity at Matched Computecited by 0
- 2026Hallucination-R1: Robustness-Oriented Paraphrase Generation for Factual Consistencycited by 0
- 2026Hallucination-R1: Robustness-Oriented Paraphrase Generation for Factual Consistency18 Sep 2026
- 2026Test-Time Augmentation for LLMs: When Input Diversity Beats Output Diversity at Matched Compute10 Aug 2026
- 2026Are We Evaluating Knowledge or Phrasing? Mitigating MCQA Sensitivity with ParaEval9 Jun 2026
- 2026Same Question, Different Answers: Evaluating LLM Reliability Beyond Accuracy18 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024How often are errors in natural language reasoning due to paraphrastic variability?
- 2023Text Alignment Is An Efficient Unified Model for Massive NLP Tasks
- 2026Learning to Trust the Crowd: A Multi-Model Consensus Reasoning Engine for Large Language Models
- 2026Finding the Cracks: Improving LLMs Reasoning with Paraphrastic Probing and Consistency Verification
- 2024Temporally Consistent Factuality Probing for Large Language Models
- 2025HellaSwag-Pro: A Large-Scale Bilingual Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs in Commonsense Reasoning
- 2026Controlled Reformulation Testing for Logical Consistency in Large Language Models
- 2023Knowledgeable Preference Alignment for LLMs in Domain-specific Question Answering