mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Text Alignment Is An Efficient Unified Model for Massive NLP Tasks

arXiv 2307.02729 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2023cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs), typically designed as a function of next-word prediction, have excelled across extensive NLP tasks. Despite the generality, next-word prediction is often not an efficient formulation for many of the tasks, demanding an extreme scale of model parameters (10s or 100s of billions) and sometimes yielding suboptimal performance. In practice, it is often desirable to build more efficient models -- despite being less versatile, they still apply to a substantial subset of problems, delivering on par or even superior performance with much smaller model sizes. In this paper, we propose text alignment as an efficient unified model for a wide range of crucial tasks involving text entailment, similarity, question answering (and answerability), factual consistency, and so forth. Given a pair of texts, the model measures the degree of alignment between their information. We instantiate an alignment model (Align) through lightweight finetuning of RoBERTa (355M parameters) using 5.9M examples from 28 datasets. Despite its compact size, extensive experiments show the model's efficiency and strong performance: (1) On over 20 datasets of aforementioned diverse tasks, the model matches or surpasses FLAN-T5 models that have around 2x or 10x more parameters; the single unified model also outperforms task-specific models finetuned on individual datasets; (2) When applied to evaluate factual consistency of language generation on 23 datasets, our model improves over various baselines, including the much larger GPT-3.5 (ChatGPT) and sometimes even GPT-4; (3) The lightweight model can also serve as an add-on component for LLMs such as GPT-3.5 in question answering tasks, improving the average exact match (EM) score by 17.94 and F1 score by 15.05 through identifying unanswerable questions.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 68 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2023.

Builds on

68 of 89 references.

References · 68

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  5. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  6. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  7. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  8. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  9. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  10. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  11. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
  12. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
38 more
  1. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
  2. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  3. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
  4. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  5. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  6. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
  7. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
  8. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
  9. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
  10. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
  11. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  12. 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 998
  13. 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 895
  14. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 883
  15. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
  16. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 798
  17. 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 742
  18. 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 736
  19. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
  20. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
  21. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 666
  22. 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 578
  23. 2019SAMSum Corpus: A Human-annotated Dialogue Dataset for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 530
  24. 2021SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarizationcited by 402
  25. 2019PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scramblingcited by 395
  26. 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 376
  27. 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 357
  28. 2019Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks for Natural Language Understandingcited by 349
  29. 2016NewsQA: A Machine Comprehension Datasetcited by 330
  30. 2015Improved Semantic Representations From Tree-Structured Long Short-Term Memory Networkscited by 305
  31. 2021Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metricscited by 285
  32. 2023AlignScore: Evaluating Factual Consistency with a Unified Alignment Functioncited by 284
  33. 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
  34. 2021QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarizationcited by 233
  35. 2021Get Your Vitamin C! Robust Fact Verification with Contrastive Evidencecited by 222
  36. 2018WikiHow: A Large Scale Text Summarization Datasetcited by 203
  37. 2018Marian: Fast Neural Machine Translation in C++cited by 202
  38. 2021Muppet: Massive Multi-task Representations with Pre-Finetuningcited by 192

50 most cited of 68 All 68 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Aligning Large Language Models with Human: A Survey
  2. 2024Aligner: Efficient Alignment by Learning to Correct
  3. 2023Large Language Model Alignment: A Survey
  4. 2025Stream Aligner: Efficient Sentence-Level Alignment via Distribution Induction
  5. 2024Weak-to-Strong Search: Align Large Language Models via Searching over Small Language Models
  6. 2025Towards Efficient and Effective Alignment of Large Language Models
  7. 2021Word Alignment by Fine-tuning Embeddings on Parallel Corpora
  8. 2024Efficient Alignment of Large Language Models via Data Sampling