A Tale of Two Geometries: Adaptive Optimizers and Non-Euclidean Descent
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adaptive optimizers can reduce to normalized steepest descent (NSD) when only adapting to the current gradient, suggesting a close connection between the two algorithmic families. A key distinction between their analyses, however, lies in the geometries, e.g., smoothness notions, they rely on. In the convex setting, adaptive optimizers are governed by a stronger adaptive smoothness condition, while NSD relies on the standard notion of smoothness. We extend the theory of adaptive smoothness to the nonconvex setting and show that it precisely characterizes the convergence of adaptive optimizers. Moreover, we establish that adaptive smoothness enables acceleration of adaptive optimizers with Nesterov momentum in the convex setting, a guarantee unattainable under standard smoothness for certain non-Euclidean geometry. We further develop an analogous comparison for stochastic optimization by introducing adaptive gradient variance, which parallels adaptive smoothness and leads to dimension-free convergence guarantees that cannot be achieved under standard gradient variance for certain non-Euclidean geometry.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2025.
Builds on
39 of 48 references.
References · 39
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2024DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermismcited by 642
- 2023Symbolic Discovery of Optimization Algorithmscited by 434
- 2025Muon is Scalable for LLM Trainingcited by 428
- 2018Shampoo: Preconditioned Stochastic Tensor Optimizationcited by 426
- 2024Old Optimizer, New Norm: An Anthologycited by 193
- 2024SOAP: Improving and Stabilizing Shampoo using Adamcited by 192
- 2025Training Deep Learning Models with Norm-Constrained LMOscited by 192
- 2018AdaGrad stepsizes: Sharp convergence over nonconvex landscapescited by 182
- 2020Momentum Improves Normalized SGDcited by 139
- 2025Fantastic Pretraining Optimizers and Where to Find Themcited by 100
27 more
- 2025Understanding Gradient Orthogonalization for Deep Learning via Non-Euclidean Trust-Region Optimizationcited by 92
- 2025Muon Optimizes Under Spectral Norm Constraintscited by 86
- 2025Practical Efficiency of Muon for Pretrainingcited by 80
- 2025AdaMuon: Adaptive Muon Optimizercited by 67
- 2024A New Perspective on Shampoo's Preconditionercited by 59
- 2014Linear Coupling: An Ultimate Unification of Gradient and Mirror Descentcited by 58
- 2024Implicit Bias of AdamW: ℓ_∞ Norm Constrained Optimizationcited by 58
- 2025ASGO: Adaptive Structured Gradient Optimizationcited by 57
- 2019UniXGrad: A Universal, Adaptive Algorithm with Optimal Guarantees for Constrained Optimizationcited by 56
- 2025PolarGrad: A Class of Matrix-Gradient Optimizers from a Unifying Preconditioning Perspectivecited by 52
- 2020The Geometry of Sign Gradient Descentcited by 41
- 2025Lions and Muons: Optimization via Stochastic Frank-Wolfe under Heavy-Tailed Noisecited by 41
- 2024The Implicit Bias of Adam on Separable Datacited by 36
- 2025Structured Preconditioners in Adaptive Optimization: A Unified Analysiscited by 33
- 2013On Lower Complexity Bounds for Large-Scale Smooth Convex Optimizationcited by 24
- 2024Adam Exploits ℓ_∞-geometry of Loss Landscape via Coordinate-wise Adaptivitycited by 23
- 2013An Almost-Linear-Time Algorithm for Approximate Max Flow in Undirected Graphs, and its Multicommodity Generalizationscited by 19
- 2017A Unified Approach to Adaptive Regularization in Online and Stochastic Optimizationcited by 19
- 2020Adaptive Gradient Methods for Constrained Convex Optimization and Variational Inequalitiescited by 18
- 2025What Really Matters in Matrix-Whitening Optimizers?cited by 16
- 2025SGD with Adaptive Preconditioning: Unified Analysis and Momentum Accelerationcited by 12
- 2020AdaSGD: Bridging the gap between SGD and Adamcited by 8
- 2022On the complexity of finding stationary points of smooth functions in one dimensioncited by 8
- 2025On the O(frac√dK1/4) Convergence Rate of AdamW Measured by ℓ1 Normcited by 8
- 2025Non-Euclidean SGD for Structured Optimization: Unified Analysis and Improved Ratescited by 8
- 2024On Linear Convergence in Smooth Convex-Concave Bilinearly-Coupled Saddle-Point Optimization: Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithmscited by 6
- 2025Better Convergence Guarantees for Sign-Based Momentum Methodscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2026Clarifying Shampoo: Adapting Spectral Descent to Stochasticity and the Parameter Trajectorycited by 8
- 2025Provable Benefit of SignGD: A Minimal Model Under Heavy-Tailed Class Imbalancecited by 5
- 2026When and Why SignSGD Outperforms SGD: A Theoretical Study Based on ℓ1-norm Lower Boundscited by 2
- 2026Convergence Rate Analysis of the AdamW-style Shampoo: Unifying One-Sided and Two-Sided Preconditioningcited by 1
- 2026Optimal Projection-Free Adaptive SGD for Matrix Optimizationcited by 1
- 2026When and Why SignSGD Outperforms SGD: A Theoretical Study Based on ℓ1-norm Lower Bounds7 May 2026
- 2026Optimal Projection-Free Adaptive SGD for Matrix Optimization2 Apr 2026
- 2026Clarifying Shampoo: Adapting Spectral Descent to Stochasticity and the Parameter Trajectory10 Feb 2026
- 2026Convergence Rate Analysis of the AdamW-style Shampoo: Unifying One-Sided and Two-Sided Preconditioning12 Jan 2026
- 2025Provable Benefit of SignGD: A Minimal Model Under Heavy-Tailed Class Imbalance30 Nov 2025