mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Provable Benefit of SignGD: A Minimal Model Under Heavy-Tailed Class Imbalance

arXiv 2512.00763 ↗First posted 30 Nov 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adaptive and non-Euclidean optimizers often outperform Euclidean methods such as stochastic gradient descent (SGD) in language modeling by a large margin. Existing theory usually explains this gap by assuming favorable smoothness geometry or noise structure tailored to the specific optimizer. We instead ask whether such geometry can be induced from a concrete learning setting. Starting from an optimizer gap that persists across realistic language-modeling experiments, we progressively remove sequence dependence, architectural complexity, and stochasticity. We find that the gap exists in a minimal setting: the softmax unigram model with heavy-tailed data. This model exposes a simple deterministic mechanism under heavy-tailed class imbalance. We prove that GD learns rare tokens slowly because the corresponding logits receive only tiny updates, while SignGD removes this magnitude dependence and moves rare and common coordinates on a more comparable scale. We make this precise with upper and lower bounds for the convergence rate of GD and upper bounds for the convergence of SignGD. Our stochastic bounds contain additional noise-dependent terms that can obscure this advantage in the convergence guarantees and can be reduced by increasing the batch size

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2025.

Builds on

23 of 39 references.

References · 23

  1. 2018signSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problemscited by 571
  2. 2018Shampoo: Preconditioned Stochastic Tensor Optimizationcited by 426
  3. 2024Old Optimizer, New Norm: An Anthologycited by 193
  4. 2025Training Deep Learning Models with Norm-Constrained LMOscited by 192
  5. 2018AdaGrad stepsizes: Sharp convergence over nonconvex landscapescited by 182
  6. 2017Dissecting Adam: The Sign, Magnitude and Variance of Stochastic Gradientscited by 139
  7. 2020Momentum Improves Normalized SGDcited by 139
  8. 2023Noise Is Not the Main Factor Behind the Gap Between SGD and Adam on Transformers, but Sign Descent Might Becited by 114
  9. 2025Understanding Gradient Orthogonalization for Deep Learning via Non-Euclidean Trust-Region Optimizationcited by 92
  10. 2024Heavy-Tailed Class Imbalance and Why Adam Outperforms Gradient Descent on Language Modelscited by 80
  11. 2024Implicit Bias of AdamW: ℓ_∞ Norm Constrained Optimizationcited by 58
  12. 2023Toward Understanding Why Adam Converges Faster Than SGD for Transformerscited by 53
11 more
  1. 2016Variance-Reduced and Projection-Free Stochastic Optimizationcited by 40
  2. 2025Structured Preconditioners in Adaptive Optimization: A Unified Analysiscited by 33
  3. 2025Scaling Laws for Gradient Descent and Sign Descent for Linear Bigram Models under Zipf's Lawcited by 24
  4. 2024Adam Exploits ℓ_∞-geometry of Loss Landscape via Coordinate-wise Adaptivitycited by 23
  5. 2024AdaGrad under Anisotropic Smoothnesscited by 22
  6. 2013An Almost-Linear-Time Algorithm for Approximate Max Flow in Undirected Graphs, and its Multicommodity Generalizationscited by 19
  7. 2024Provable Complexity Improvement of AdaGrad over SGD: Upper and Lower Bounds in Stochastic Non-Convex Optimizationcited by 16
  8. 2025SGD with Adaptive Preconditioning: Unified Analysis and Momentum Accelerationcited by 12
  9. 2021Heavy Ball Momentum for Conditional Gradientcited by 7
  10. 2024Stochastic Frank-Wolfe: Unified Analysis and Zoo of Special Casescited by 5
  11. 2025A Tale of Two Geometries: Adaptive Optimizers and Non-Euclidean Descentcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.