mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Perceptual Taxonomy: Evaluating and Guiding Hierarchical Scene Reasoning in Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2511.19526 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2025cs.CVcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

We propose Perceptual Taxonomy, a structured process of scene understanding that first recognizes objects and their spatial configurations, then infers task-relevant properties such as material, affordance, function, and physical attributes to support goal-directed reasoning. While this form of reasoning is fundamental to human cognition, current vision-language benchmarks lack comprehensive evaluation of this ability and instead focus on surface-level recognition or image-text alignment. To address this gap, we introduce Perceptual Taxonomy, a benchmark for physically grounded visual reasoning. We annotate 3173 objects with four property families covering 84 fine-grained attributes. Using these annotations, we construct a multiple-choice question benchmark with 5802 images across both synthetic and real domains. The benchmark contains 28033 template-based questions spanning four types (object description, spatial reasoning, property matching, and taxonomy reasoning), along with 50 expert-crafted questions designed to evaluate models across the full spectrum of perceptual taxonomy reasoning. Experimental results show that leading vision-language models perform well on recognition tasks but degrade by 10 to 20 percent on property-driven questions, especially those requiring multi-step reasoning over structured attributes. These findings highlight a persistent gap in structured visual understanding and the limitations of current models that rely heavily on pattern matching. We also show that providing in-context reasoning examples from simulated scenes improves performance on real-world and expert-curated questions, demonstrating the effectiveness of perceptual-taxonomy-guided prompting.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 14 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2025.

Builds on

14 of 55 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency25 Aug

Other references · 13

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  2. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  3. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  4. 2024STAR: A Benchmark for Situated Reasoning in Real-World Videoscited by 213
  5. 2025PhysBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Vision-Language Models for Physical World Understandingcited by 160
  6. 2023SEED-Bench-2: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 97
  7. 2024Unfamiliar Finetuning Examples Control How Language Models Hallucinatecited by 87
  8. 2025SpatialReasoner: Towards Explicit and Generalizable 3D Spatial Reasoningcited by 68
  9. 2025ZeroBench: An Impossible Visual Benchmark for Contemporary Large Multimodal Modelscited by 58
  10. 2025PhysX-3D: Physical-Grounded 3D Asset Generationcited by 42
  11. 2024PhysGame: Uncovering Physical Commonsense Violations in Gameplay Videoscited by 22
  12. 2025Hypo3D: Exploring Hypothetical Reasoning in 3Dcited by 5
1 more
  1. 2025Affordance Benchmark for MLLMscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025VisRes Bench: On Evaluating the Visual Reasoning Capabilities of VLMs
  2. 2025Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025Reasoning in Computer Vision: Taxonomy, Models, Tasks, and Methodologies
  4. 2025A Study of Commonsense Reasoning over Visual Object Properties
  5. 2026SceneBench: A Hierarchical Benchmark for Vision-Language Understanding of 3D Scenes
  6. 2026The Last Visible Pixel: Probing Fine-Scale Perception in Vision-Language Models
  7. 2025Spatial Reasoning in Foundation Models: Benchmarking Object-Centric Spatial Understanding
  8. 2026Seeing Isn't Orienting: A Cognitively Grounded Benchmark Reveals Systematic Orientation Failures in MLLMs Supplementary