mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SceneBench: A Hierarchical Benchmark for Vision-Language Understanding of 3D Scenes

arXiv 2609.16233 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models excel at 2D image understanding but remain limited in 3D spatial reasoning. Progress is hindered by limitations in current benchmarks. First, 3D datasets often rely on point clouds that capture geometry but discard rich visual features like texture, text, and materials. Second, annotations treat objects in isolation while ignoring real-world hierarchical organization (scenes, rooms, functional areas, object groups). Third, evaluation tasks focus narrowly on basic recognition rather than multi-step spatial reasoning. In this context, we introduce SceneBench, a benchmark of 966 photorealistic 3D scenes reconstructed with Gaussian Splatting and densely annotated with hierarchical semantics spanning scenes, rooms, functional areas, object groups, and individual objects. These annotations are produced through a human-in-the-loop pipeline combining vision-language models with roughly 1,500 human-hours of iterative refinement and verification, producing over 183K annotated nodes with textual descriptions and 3D bounding boxes. Building on this representation, we define three evaluation tasks: Existence-Based Questions probing object attributes, Spatial Intelligence Questions covering counting, size comparison, distance, and directional relations, and Grounded Question-Reasoning-Answer (QRA) triplets requiring multi-step reasoning across semantic levels. Experiments with state-of-the-art vision-language models show that while models perform well on basic recognition tasks (e.g., up to 85% accuracy for detection), performance drops substantially on hierarchical and compositional reasoning (e.g., down to 60% for counting), revealing limitations not captured by existing benchmarks. SceneBench provides a realistic testbed for developing and evaluating models capable of fine-grained spatial reasoning in photorealistic 3D environments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Semantic Abstraction: Open-World 3D Scene Understanding from 2D Vision-Language Models
  2. 2026Do Vision-Language Models Understand 3D Scenes or Just Catalogue Objects?
  3. 2025SURPRISE3D: A Dataset for Spatial Understanding and Reasoning in Complex 3D Scenes
  4. 2025From Flatland to Space: Teaching Vision-Language Models to Perceive and Reason in 3D
  5. 2025Text-Scene: A Scene-to-Language Parsing Framework for 3D Scene Understanding
  6. 2026Imagine3D-LLM: Teaching MLLMs to Imagine 3D Scenes Before Answering
  7. 2026SceneScaffold: Active Scene-State Construction for Unified 3D Scene Understanding
  8. 2024Lexicon3D: Probing Visual Foundation Models for Complex 3D Scene Understanding