Subtract the Corruption: Training-Data-Free Corrective Machine Unlearning using Task Arithmetic
On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning
Abstract (arXiv)
Corrupted training data are ubiquitous. Corrective Machine Unlearning (CMU) seeks to remove the influence of such corruption post-training. Prior CMU typically assumes access to identified corrupted training samples (a "forget set"). However, in many real-world scenarios the training data are no longer accessible. We formalize source-free CMU, where the original training data are unavailable and, consequently, no forget set of identified corrupted training samples can be specified. Instead, we assume a small proxy (surrogate) set of corrupted samples that reflect the suspected corruption type without needing to be the original training samples. In this stricter setting, methods relying on forget set are ineffective or narrow in scope. We introduce Corrective Unlearning in Task Space (CUTS), a lightweight weight space correction method guided by the proxy set using task arithmetic principles. CUTS treats the clean and the corruption signal as distinct tasks. Specifically, we briefly fine-tune the corrupted model on the proxy to amplify the corruption mechanism in the weight space, compute the difference between the corrupted and fine-tuned weights as a proxy task vector, and subtract a calibrated multiple of this vector to cancel the corruption. Without access to clean data or a forget set, CUTS recovers a large fraction of the lost utility under label noise and, for backdoor triggers, nearly eliminates the attack with minimal damage to utility, outperforming state-of-the-art specialized CMU methods in source-free setting.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 55 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2025.
Builds on
55 of 71 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Redirection for Erasing Memory (REM): Towards a universal unlearning method for corrupted data23 May
- 2025When is Task Vector Provably Effective for Model Editing? A Generalization Analysis of Nonlinear Transformers15 Apr
- 2024SAP: Corrective Machine Unlearning with Scaled Activation Projection for Label Noise Robustness13 Mar
- 2023Fast Machine Unlearning Without Retraining Through Selective Synaptic Dampening15 Aug
- 2023Machine Unlearning: Solutions and Challenges14 Aug
- 2023Towards Unbounded Machine Unlearning20 Feb
- 2022Can Bad Teaching Induce Forgetting? Unlearning in Deep Networks using an Incompetent Teacher17 May
Other references · 48
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
- 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,055
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
- 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 618
36 more
- 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 588
- 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 535
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 497
- 2018Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attackscited by 484
- 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 465
- 2019Does Learning Require Memorization? A Short Tale about a Long Tailcited by 460
- 2019Dreaming to Distill: Data-free Knowledge Transfer via DeepInversioncited by 423
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 395
- 2018Essentially No Barriers in Neural Network Energy Landscapecited by 330
- 2017Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attackscited by 303
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2023Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practicalcited by 290
- 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
- 2021Anti-Backdoor Learning: Training Clean Models on Poisoned Datacited by 263
- 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
- 2020Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision?cited by 237
- 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
- 2023Task Arithmetic in the Tangent Space: Improved Editing of Pre-Trained Modelscited by 221
- 2019Data-Free Learning of Student Networkscited by 204
- 2019SGD on Neural Networks Learns Functions of Increasing Complexitycited by 204
- 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
- 2022Backdoor Defense via Decoupling the Training Processcited by 153
- 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
- 2021Deep Learning Through the Lens of Example Difficultycited by 141
- 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
- 2021FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 82
- 2021On the geometry of generalization and memorization in deep neural networkscited by 73
- 2023Can Neural Network Memorization Be Localized?cited by 69
- 2014Training Convolutional Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 48
- 2025A Survey on Backdoor Threats in Large Language Models (LLMs): Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluationscited by 27
- 2022From Noisy Prediction to True Label: Noisy Prediction Calibration via Generative Modelcited by 22
- 2025Efficient Model Editing with Task-Localized Sparse Fine-tuningcited by 16
- 2024Potion: Towards Poison Unlearningcited by 14
- 2023Learning with Noisy Labels through Learnable Weighting and Centroid Similaritycited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026The BatchNorm Illusion: Diagnosing Normalization Artifacts in Machine Unlearning Evaluation
- 2024nabla τ: Gradient-based and Task-Agnostic machine Unlearning
- 2026Unmerge: Efficient Machine Unlearning via Task Arithmetic
- 2025Efficient Machine Unlearning by Model Splitting and Core Sample Selection
- 2024MU-Bench: A Multitask Multimodal Benchmark for Machine Unlearning
- 2024Remaining-data-free Machine Unlearning by Suppressing Sample Contribution
- 2026EVE: Efficient Verification of Data Erasure through Customized Perturbation in Approximate Unlearning
- 2024Corrective Machine Unlearning