Anchor: Mitigating Artifact Drift in Agent Benchmark Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI agents are beginning to complete valuable, long-horizon business operations tasks, but training and evaluation environments for enterprise work still struggle to balance realism, verifiability, and scale. Environment and task creation frequently suffers from a failure mode we call artifact drift: when instructions, environments, oracles, and verifiers are created by loosely coupled processes, they frequently disagree on what a task requires, producing environments that are unsolvable, reward-hackable, or inconsistent. We introduce Anchor, a task-generation pipeline that formalizes domain experts' specifications of business workflows into constraint optimization programs. From a single parametric specification, the pipeline jointly produces a natural-language instruction, environment configuration, solver-certified ground-truth solution, and state-based verifier. With Anchor, altering parameters yields new tasks with controlled difficulty and known optimal solutions, producing harness-agnostic environments whose rewards depend solely on end-state business correctness. We apply Anchor to produce ERP-Bench: a benchmark of 300 long-horizon tasks spanning procurement and manufacturing workflows in a production-grade ERP system. We find that generation parameters predict realized difficulty, and that frontier models satisfy explicit task constraints in 26.1% of trials but reach a fully optimal solution in only 17.4% of trials. Overall, we show that Anchor and ERP-Bench offer a concrete recipe for building auditable evaluation environments for economically valuable agent work. We release the task generator and ERP-Bench dataset at erpbench.ai
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.
Builds on
9 of 17 references.
References · 9
- 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,402
- 2025τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environmentcited by 627
- 2025Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agentscited by 204
- 2025Establishing Best Practices for Building Rigorous Agentic Benchmarkscited by 102
- 2024SWE-Bench+: Enhanced Coding Benchmark for LLMscited by 99
- 2025AgentSynth: Scalable Task Generation for Generalist Computer-Use Agentscited by 46
- 2025UTBoost: Rigorous Evaluation of Coding Agents on SWE-Benchcited by 45
- 2025Beyond Accuracy: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for Evaluating Enterprise Agentic AI Systemscited by 8
- 2025Continuous Benchmark Generation for Evaluating Enterprise-scale LLM Agentscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026What Makes Good Agentic Data? An ACE Lens on Data Generation for LLM Agentscited by 3
- 2026ChartBmkAgent: Harness-Governed Multi-Agent Construction of Chart QA Benchmarks from Sparse Error-Taxonomy Specificationscited by 0
- 2026WorkRover: Scaling Long-Horizon Cowork Agent Training Via Recursive Environment Evolutioncited by 0
- 2026Tev: Scaling Long-Horizon Agentic Environments with Dense Progress Rewardscited by 0
- 2026Interlock: From Local Correctness to Task Completion in Long-Horizon Agentscited by 0
- 2026Interlock: From Local Correctness to Task Completion in Long-Horizon Agents14 Oct 2026
- 2026Tev: Scaling Long-Horizon Agentic Environments with Dense Progress Rewards13 Oct 2026
- 2026WorkRover: Scaling Long-Horizon Cowork Agent Training Via Recursive Environment Evolution13 Oct 2026
- 2026ChartBmkAgent: Harness-Governed Multi-Agent Construction of Chart QA Benchmarks from Sparse Error-Taxonomy Specifications6 Oct 2026
- 2026What Makes Good Agentic Data? An ACE Lens on Data Generation for LLM Agents27 Aug 2026