Evaluation-Driven Development and Operations of LLM Agents: A Process Model and Reference Architecture
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled the emergence of LLM agents, systems capable of pursuing under-specified goals and adapting after deployment. Evaluating such agents is challenging because their behavior is open ended, probabilistic, and shaped by system-level interactions over time. Traditional evaluation methods, built around fixed benchmarks and static test suites, fail to capture emergent behaviors or support continuous adaptation across the lifecycle. To ground a more systematic approach, we conduct a multivocal literature review (MLR) synthesizing academic and industrial evaluation practices. The findings directly inform two empirically derived artifacts: a process model and a reference architecture that embed evaluation as a continuous, governing function rather than a terminal checkpoint. Together they constitute the evaluation-driven development and operations (EDDOps) approach, which unifies offline (development-time) and online (runtime) evaluation within a closed feedback loop. By making evaluation evidence drive both runtime adaptation and governed redevelopment, EDDOps supports safer, more traceable evolution of LLM agents aligned with changing objectives, user needs, and governance constraints.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 32 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2024.
Builds on
32 of 87 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Watch Every Step! LLM Agent Learning via Iterative Step-Level Process Refinement17 Jun
- 2024StreamBench: Towards Benchmarking Continuous Improvement of Language Agents13 Jun
- 2024AgentQuest: A Modular Benchmark Framework to Measure Progress and Improve LLM Agents9 Apr
- 2024AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents24 Jan
- 2023AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviors21 Aug
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents7 Aug
Other references · 26
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
- 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 546
- 2023NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmarkcited by 348
- 2023FinanceBench: A New Benchmark for Financial Question Answeringcited by 270
- 2024LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM Benchmarkcited by 262
- 2024On LLMs-Driven Synthetic Data Generation, Curation, and Evaluation: A Surveycited by 244
- 2024Tool Learning with Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 223
- 2023PIXIU: A Large Language Model, Instruction Data and Evaluation Benchmark for Financecited by 222
- 2023ClassEval: A Manually-Crafted Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Class-level Code Generationcited by 168
- 2024Evaluating Frontier Models for Dangerous Capabilitiescited by 128
14 more
- 2023LawBench: Benchmarking Legal Knowledge of Large Language Modelscited by 117
- 2024BetterBench: Assessing AI Benchmarks, Uncovering Issues, and Establishing Best Practicescited by 114
- 2024A Survey on Benchmarks of Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 82
- 2024Agent-E: From Autonomous Web Navigation to Foundational Design Principles in Agentic Systemscited by 81
- 2024Introducing v0.5 of the AI Safety Benchmark from MLCommonscited by 62
- 2024RAGChecker: A Fine-grained Framework for Diagnosing Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 61
- 2024Risks of AI Scientists: Prioritizing Safeguarding Over Autonomycited by 49
- 2024AgentOps: Enabling Observability of LLM Agentscited by 46
- 2020Benchmarking in Optimization: Best Practice and Open Issuescited by 38
- 2024COMPL-AI Framework: A Technical Interpretation and LLM Benchmarking Suite for the EU Artificial Intelligence Actcited by 24
- 2024Safety cases for frontier AIcited by 18
- 2024Beyond Functional Correctness: Investigating Coding Style Inconsistencies in Large Language Modelscited by 15
- 2024Swiss Cheese Model for AI Safety: A Taxonomy and Reference Architecture for Multi-Layered Guardrails of Foundation Model Based Agentscited by 14
- 2024Evaluating AI Evaluation: Perils and Prospectscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 8.
11 papers.
- 2025FutureX: An Advanced Live Benchmark for LLM Agents in Future Predictioncited by 59
- 2025When AIs Judge AIs: The Rise of Agent-as-a-Judge Evaluation for LLMscited by 17
- 2026From Fluent to Verifiable: Claim-Level Auditability for Deep Research Agentscited by 7
- 2026How Do Practitioners Build SE Agents? Insights from a Mixed-Methods Studycited by 2
- 2026Loosely-Structured Software: Engineering Context, Structure, and Evolution Entropy in Runtime-Rewired Multi-Agent Systemscited by 1
- 2026SEAR: Schema-Based Evaluation and Routing for LLM Gatewayscited by 1
- 2026AI Assurance: A Comprehensive Testing Strategy for Enterprise AI Systemscited by 1
- 2025Diagnostics of cognitive failures in multi-agent expert systems using dynamic evaluation protocols and subsequent mutation of the processing contextcited by 0
- 2026Layer-Isolated Evaluation: Gating the Deterministic Scaffold of a Production LLM Agent with a No-LLM, Regression-Locked Test Harnesscited by 0
- 2026Registry-Governed Agent Lifecycle:Completing EDDOps with Evaluation-DrivenRegistration, Promotion, and Retirement on AWS AgentCorecited by 0
- 2026A Case Study in Assuring AI-Written Softwarecited by 0
- 2026A Case Study in Assuring AI-Written Software6 Oct 2026
- 2026How Do Practitioners Build SE Agents? Insights from a Mixed-Methods Study12 Jul 2026
- 2026Registry-Governed Agent Lifecycle:Completing EDDOps with Evaluation-DrivenRegistration, Promotion, and Retirement on AWS AgentCore1 Jul 2026
- 2026Layer-Isolated Evaluation: Gating the Deterministic Scaffold of a Production LLM Agent with a No-LLM, Regression-Locked Test Harness10 Jun 2026
- 2026AI Assurance: A Comprehensive Testing Strategy for Enterprise AI Systems22 May 2026
- 2026SEAR: Schema-Based Evaluation and Routing for LLM Gateways20 Mar 2026
- 2026Loosely-Structured Software: Engineering Context, Structure, and Evolution Entropy in Runtime-Rewired Multi-Agent Systems16 Mar 2026
- 2026From Fluent to Verifiable: Claim-Level Auditability for Deep Research Agents14 Feb 2026
- 2025Diagnostics of cognitive failures in multi-agent expert systems using dynamic evaluation protocols and subsequent mutation of the processing context18 Sep 2025
- 2025FutureX: An Advanced Live Benchmark for LLM Agents in Future Prediction16 Aug 2025
- 2025When AIs Judge AIs: The Rise of Agent-as-a-Judge Evaluation for LLMs5 Aug 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Agent Gym: A Framework for Continuous Evaluation and Evolution of LLM Agents Through Human-in-the-Loop Feedback
- 2026AgentCompass: A Unified Evaluation Infrastructure for Agent Capabilities
- 2026Reliable and Developer-Aligned Evaluation of Agents for Software Engineering
- 2026EvalBuilder: Can LLMs Build Efficient Benchmarks?
- 2026EvoProbe: Evaluation-Driven Benchmark Evolution for LLM Agents
- 2026The Evolution of Tool Use in LLM Agents: From Single-Tool Call to Multi-Tool Orchestration
- 2026One-Eval: An Agentic System for Automated and Traceable LLM Evaluation
- 2025Empowering Real-World: A Survey on the Technology, Practice, and Evaluation of LLM-driven Industry Agents