mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PublicAgent: Multi-Agent Design Principles From an LLM-Based Open Data Analysis Framework

arXiv 2511.03023 ↗First posted 4 Nov 2025cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Open data repositories hold potential for evidence-based decision-making, yet are inaccessible to non-experts lacking expertise in dataset discovery, schema mapping, and statistical analysis. Large language models show promise for individual tasks, but end-to-end analytical workflows expose fundamental limitations: attention dilutes across growing contexts, specialized reasoning patterns interfere, and errors propagate undetected. We present PublicAgent, a multi-agent framework that addresses these limitations through decomposition into specialized agents for intent clarification, dataset discovery, analysis, and reporting. This architecture maintains focused attention within agent contexts and enables validation at each stage. Evaluation across five models and 50 queries derives five design principles for multi-agent LLM systems. First, specialization provides value independent of model strength--even the strongest model shows 97.5% agent win rates, with benefits orthogonal to model scale. Second, agents divide into universal (discovery, analysis) and conditional (report, intent) categories. Universal agents show consistent effectiveness (std dev 12.4%) while conditional agents vary by model (std dev 20.5%). Third, agents mitigate distinct failure modes--removing discovery or analysis causes catastrophic failures (243-280 instances), while removing report or intent causes quality degradation. Fourth, architectural benefits persist across task complexity with stable win rates (86-92% analysis, 84-94% discovery), indicating workflow management value rather than reasoning enhancement. Fifth, wide variance in agent effectiveness across models (42-96% for analysis) requires model-aware architecture design. These principles guide when and why specialization is necessary for complex analytical workflows while enabling broader access to public data through natural language interfaces.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 39 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2025.

Builds on

39 of 55 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023TaskWeaver: A Code-First Agent Framework29 Nov

Other references · 38

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  4. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  5. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
  6. 2024RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?cited by 1,270
  7. 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,173
  8. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,120
  9. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
  10. 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 893
  11. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
  12. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 679
26 more
  1. 2023AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviorscited by 580
  2. 2021FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Datacited by 552
  3. 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 432
  4. 2025Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMscited by 424
  5. 2019RAT-SQL: Relation-Aware Schema Encoding and Linking for Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 420
  6. 2023Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluationcited by 378
  7. 2017Survey of the State of the Art in Natural Language Generation: Core tasks, applications and evaluationcited by 206
  8. 2024The Effect of Sampling Temperature on Problem Solving in Large Language Modelscited by 168
  9. 2023ChartLlama: A Multimodal LLM for Chart Understanding and Generationcited by 158
  10. 2023Query2doc: Query Expansion with Large Language Modelscited by 146
  11. 2017SQLNet: Generating Structured Queries From Natural Language Without Reinforcement Learningcited by 135
  12. 2024LLM Multi-Agent Systems: Challenges and Open Problemscited by 119
  13. 2021KaggleDBQA: Realistic Evaluation of Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 105
  14. 2023Synthetic Data Generation with Large Language Models for Text Classification: Potential and Limitationscited by 96
  15. 2023Perspectives on Large Language Models for Relevance Judgmentcited by 84
  16. 2023LIDA: A Tool for Automatic Generation of Grammar-Agnostic Visualizations and Infographics using Large Language Modelscited by 80
  17. 2019Ablation Studies in Artificial Neural Networkscited by 58
  18. 2020ConvAI3: Generating Clarifying Questions for Open-Domain Dialogue Systems (ClariQ)cited by 55
  19. 2024MegaAgent: A Large-Scale Autonomous LLM-based Multi-Agent System Without Predefined SOPscited by 45
  20. 2023Beyond Factuality: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models as Knowledge Generatorscited by 42
  21. 2023Large Language Model-Aware In-Context Learning for Code Generationcited by 42
  22. 2024Agent-Oriented Planning in Multi-Agent Systemscited by 34
  23. 2023Making Large Language Models Better Data Creatorscited by 28
  24. 2024AIDE: An Automatic Data Engine for Object Detection in Autonomous Drivingcited by 26
  25. 2023L2CEval: Evaluating Language-to-Code Generation Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 22
  26. 2023CoT-BERT: Enhancing Unsupervised Sentence Representation through Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025LLM-Based Data Science Agents: A Survey of Capabilities, Challenges, and Future Directions
  2. 2025Large Language Model-based Data Science Agent: A Survey
  3. 2024A Survey on Large Language Model-based Agents for Statistics and Data Science
  4. 2025InsightEval: An Expert-Curated Benchmark for Assessing Insight Discovery in LLM-Driven Data Agents
  5. 2026AgenticDataBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Data Agents
  6. 2025Towards Scientific Intelligence: A Survey of LLM-based Scientific Agents
  7. 2026When Agents Implement Systems: A Case Study in Defects, Detection, and Evaluation Rigor
  8. 2025DataSage: Multi-agent Collaboration for Insight Discovery with External Knowledge Retrieval, Multi-role Debating, and Multi-path Reasoning