mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LLM-Based Data Science Agents: A Survey of Capabilities, Challenges, and Future Directions

arXiv 2510.04023 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2025cs.AI cs.CLcited by 7

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled a new class of AI agents that automate multiple stages of the data science workflow by integrating planning, tool use, and multimodal reasoning across text, code, tables, and visuals. This survey presents the first comprehensive, lifecycle-aligned taxonomy of data science agents, systematically analyzing and mapping forty-five systems onto the six stages of the end-to-end data science process: business understanding and data acquisition, exploratory analysis and visualization, feature engineering, model building and selection, interpretation and explanation, and deployment and monitoring. In addition to lifecycle coverage, we annotate each agent along five cross-cutting design dimensions: reasoning and planning style, modality integration, tool orchestration depth, learning and alignment methods, and trust, safety, and governance mechanisms. Beyond classification, we provide a critical synthesis of agent capabilities, highlight strengths and limitations at each stage, and review emerging benchmarks and evaluation practices. Our analysis identifies three key trends: most systems emphasize exploratory analysis, visualization, and modeling while neglecting business understanding, deployment, and monitoring; multimodal reasoning and tool orchestration remain unresolved challenges; and over 90% lack explicit trust and safety mechanisms. We conclude by outlining open challenges in alignment stability, explainability, governance, and robust evaluation frameworks, and propose future research directions to guide the development of robust, trustworthy, low-latency, transparent, and broadly accessible data science agents.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 5 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2025.

Builds on

5 of 79 references.

References · 5

  1. 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Trainingcited by 399
  2. 2025ScreenSpot-Pro: GUI Grounding for Professional High-Resolution Computer Usecited by 246
  3. 2024ChartGemma: Visual Instruction-tuning for Chart Reasoning in the Wildcited by 79
  4. 2024ChartInstruct: Instruction Tuning for Chart Comprehension and Reasoningcited by 68
  5. 2024Perception Tokens Enhance Visual Reasoning in Multimodal Language Modelscited by 68

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Large Language Model-based Data Science Agent: A Survey
  2. 2025Measuring Data Science Automation: A Survey of Evaluation Tools for AI Assistants and Agents
  3. 2024A Survey on Large Language Model-based Agents for Statistics and Data Science
  4. 2025Towards Scientific Intelligence: A Survey of LLM-based Scientific Agents
  5. 2024Data Interpreter: An LLM Agent For Data Science
  6. 2025LLM/Agent-as-Data-Analyst: A Survey
  7. 2025Data Agent: A Holistic Architecture for Orchestrating Data+AI Ecosystems
  8. 2025DatawiseAgent: A Notebook-Centric LLM Agent Framework for Adaptive and Robust Data Science Automation