PrivaDE: Privacy-preserving Data Evaluation for Blockchain-based Data Marketplaces
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Evaluating the usefulness of data before purchase is essential when obtaining data for high-quality machine learning models, yet both model builders and data providers are often unwilling to reveal their proprietary assets. We present PrivaDE, a privacy-preserving protocol that allows a model owner and a data owner to jointly compute a utility score for a candidate dataset without fully exposing model parameters, raw features, or labels. PrivaDE provides strong security against malicious behavior and can be integrated into blockchain-based marketplaces, where smart contracts enforce fair execution and payment. To make the protocol practical, we propose optimizations to enable efficient secure model inference, and a model-agnostic scoring method that uses only a small, representative subset of the data while still reflecting its impact on downstream training. Evaluation shows that PrivaDE performs data evaluation effectively, achieving online runtimes within 15 minutes even for models with millions of parameters. Our work lays the foundation for fair and automated data marketplaces in decentralized machine learning ecosystems.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 107 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2025.
Builds on
30 of 107 references.
References · 30
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2014FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Netscited by 1,653
- 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
- 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
- 2018Split learning for health: Distributed deep learning without sharing raw patient datacited by 395
- 2019On the Efficacy of Knowledge Distillationcited by 381
- 2019Learning Loss for Active Learningcited by 336
- 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 292
- 2021LogME: Practical Assessment of Pre-trained Models for Transfer Learningcited by 172
18 more
- 2017Suggestive Annotation: A Deep Active Learning Framework for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 146
- 2020A Principled Approach to Data Valuation for Federated Learningcited by 127
- 2022The Shapley Value in Machine Learningcited by 98
- 2019Diverse mini-batch Active Learningcited by 89
- 2020Collaborative Machine Learning with Incentive-Aware Model Rewardscited by 71
- 2017SafetyNets: Verifiable Execution of Deep Neural Networks on an Untrusted Cloudcited by 50
- 2018Model-based Pricing for Machine Learning in a Data Marketplacecited by 37
- 2020BLAZE: Blazing Fast Privacy-Preserving Machine Learningcited by 32
- 2022Scaling up Trustless DNN Inference with Zero-Knowledge Proofscited by 31
- 2020SWIFT: Super-fast and Robust Privacy-Preserving Machine Learningcited by 20
- 2020BitTensor: A Peer-to-Peer Intelligence Marketcited by 16
- 2022Private Data Valuation and Fair Payment in Data Marketplacescited by 14
- 2019Collaborative Machine Learning Markets with Data-Replication-Robust Paymentscited by 13
- 2022Secure Shapley Value for Cross-Silo Federated Learning (Technical Report)cited by 13
- 2019Scalability vs. Utility: Do We Have to Sacrifice One for the Other in Data Importance Quantification?cited by 9
- 2015Influence in Classification via Cooperative Game Theorycited by 7
- 2023A Survey of Data Pricing for Data Marketplacescited by 6
- 2023C2PI: An Efficient Crypto-Clear Two-Party Neural Network Private Inferencecited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.