mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DeceptionBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for AI Deception Behaviors in Real-world Scenarios

arXiv 2510.15501 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the remarkable advances of Large Language Models (LLMs) across diverse cognitive tasks, the rapid enhancement of these capabilities also introduces emergent deceptive behaviors that may induce severe risks in high-stakes deployments. More critically, the characterization of deception across realistic real-world scenarios remains underexplored. To bridge this gap, we establish DeceptionBench, the first benchmark that systematically evaluates how deceptive tendencies manifest across different societal domains, what their intrinsic behavioral patterns are, and how extrinsic factors affect them. Specifically, on the static count, the benchmark encompasses 150 meticulously designed scenarios in five domains, i.e., Economy, Healthcare, Education, Social Interaction, and Entertainment, with over 1,000 samples, providing sufficient empirical foundations for deception analysis. On the intrinsic dimension, we explore whether models exhibit self-interested egoistic tendencies or sycophantic behaviors that prioritize user appeasement. On the extrinsic dimension, we investigate how contextual factors modulate deceptive outputs under neutral conditions, reward-based incentivization, and coercive pressures. Moreover, we incorporate sustained multi-turn interaction loops to construct a more realistic simulation of real-world feedback dynamics. Extensive experiments across LLMs and Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) reveal critical vulnerabilities, particularly amplified deception under reinforcement dynamics, demonstrating that current models lack robust resistance to manipulative contextual cues and the urgent need for advanced safeguards against various deception behaviors. Code and resources are publicly available at https://github.com/Aries-iai/DeceptionBench.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2025.

Builds on

31 of 52 references.

References · 31

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  4. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
  5. 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 988
  6. 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMscited by 533
  7. 2023AI Deception: A Survey of Examples, Risks, and Potential Solutionscited by 185
  8. 2023EconAgent: Large Language Model-Empowered Agents for Simulating Macroeconomic Activitiescited by 154
  9. 2023ProPILE: Probing Privacy Leakage in Large Language Modelscited by 127
  10. 2024Simulating Classroom Education with LLM-Empowered Agentscited by 125
  11. 2023Deception Abilities Emerged in Large Language Modelscited by 99
  12. 2025STAIR: Improving Safety Alignment with Introspective Reasoningcited by 72
19 more
  1. 2024T2VSafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Text-to-Video Generative Modelscited by 66
  2. 2025RealSafe-R1: Safety-Aligned DeepSeek-R1 without Compromising Reasoning Capabilitycited by 58
  3. 2023Do LLM Agents Exhibit Social Behavior?cited by 53
  4. 2024MultiTrust: A Comprehensive Benchmark Towards Trustworthy Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 51
  5. 2025Don't Overthink It: A Survey of Efficient R1-style Large Reasoning Modelscited by 36
  6. 2024Uncovering Deceptive Tendencies in Language Models: A Simulated Company AI Assistantcited by 32
  7. 2025Mitigating Overthinking in Large Reasoning Models via Manifold Steeringcited by 32
  8. 2024AI-LieDar: Examine the Trade-off Between Utility and Truthfulness in LLM Agentscited by 28
  9. 2025Mitigating Deceptive Alignment via Self-Monitoringcited by 25
  10. 2024When to Retrieve: Teaching LLMs to Utilize Information Retrieval Effectivelycited by 20
  11. 2024BeHonest: Benchmarking Honesty in Large Language Modelscited by 20
  12. 2025Oyster-I: Beyond Refusal -- Constructive Safety Alignment for Responsible Language Modelscited by 19
  13. 2023The Looming Threat of Fake and LLM-generated LinkedIn Profiles: Challenges and Opportunities for Detection and Preventioncited by 18
  14. 2025Breaking the Ceiling: Exploring the Potential of Jailbreak Attacks through Expanding Strategy Spacecited by 15
  15. 2024The Effects of Embodiment and Personality Expression on Learning in LLM-based Educational Agentscited by 13
  16. 2025A Multi-LLM-Agent-Based Framework for Economic and Public Policy Analysiscited by 11
  17. 2024Can Large Language Models Detect Rumors on Social Media?cited by 9
  18. 2024The Shadow of Fraud: The Emerging Danger of AI-powered Social Engineering and its Possible Curecited by 5
  19. 2025Unveiling Trust in Multimodal Large Language Models: Evaluation, Analysis, and Mitigationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 13.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Lying to Win: Assessing LLM Deception through Human-AI Games and Parallel-World Probing
  2. 2025Among Us: A Sandbox for Measuring and Detecting Agentic Deception
  3. 2026DecepEval: A Benchmark for Evaluating Deception in LLM Agents
  4. 2025Debate with Images: Detecting Deceptive Behaviors in Multimodal Large Language Models
  5. 2026Can Agents Deceive? Evaluating Reasoning and Deception in ParliamentBench using a Social Deduction Game
  6. 2025OpenDeception: Learning Deception and Trust in Human-AI Interaction via Multi-Agent Simulation
  7. 2025Beyond Prompt-Induced Lies: Investigating LLM Deception on Benign Prompts
  8. 2025The MASK Benchmark: Disentangling Honesty From Accuracy in AI Systems