BeHonest: Benchmarking Honesty in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Previous works on Large Language Models (LLMs) have mainly focused on evaluating their helpfulness or harmlessness. However, honesty, another crucial alignment criterion, has received relatively less attention. Dishonest behaviors in LLMs, such as spreading misinformation and defrauding users, present severe risks that intensify as these models approach superintelligent levels. Enhancing honesty in LLMs addresses critical limitations and helps uncover latent capabilities that are not readily expressed. This underscores the urgent need for reliable methods and benchmarks to effectively ensure and evaluate the honesty of LLMs. In this paper, we introduce BeHonest, a pioneering benchmark specifically designed to assess honesty in LLMs comprehensively. BeHonest evaluates three essential aspects of honesty: awareness of knowledge boundaries, avoidance of deceit, and consistency in responses. Building on this foundation, we designed 10 scenarios to evaluate and analyze 9 popular LLMs on the market, including both closed-source and open-source models from different model families with varied model sizes. Our findings indicate that there is still significant room for improvement in the honesty of LLMs. We encourage the AI community to prioritize honesty alignment in these models, which can harness their full potential to benefit society while preventing them from causing harm through deception or inconsistency. Our benchmark and code can be found at: urlhttps://github.com/GAIR-NLP/BeHonest.
Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 64 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2024.
Builds on
64 of 70 references.
References · 64
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
38 more
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,081
- 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,023
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 988
- 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 805
- 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 787
- 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 778
- 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 733
- 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 696
- 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 695
- 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 683
- 2023Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 668
- 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 505
- 2024Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Trainingcited by 478
- 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignmentcited by 394
- 2024TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Modelscited by 280
- 2023Do Large Language Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 238
- 2023Exploring Large Language Models for Communication Games: An Empirical Study on Werewolfcited by 238
- 2024Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?cited by 227
- 2022Active Example Selection for In-Context Learningcited by 195
- 2023AI Deception: A Survey of Examples, Risks, and Potential Solutionscited by 185
- 2023Simple synthetic data reduces sycophancy in large language modelscited by 174
- 2023Model evaluation for extreme riskscited by 167
- 2023Med-HALT: Medical Domain Hallucination Test for Large Language Modelscited by 156
- 2024Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Modelscited by 144
- 2023Representational Strengths and Limitations of Transformerscited by 132
- 2023Deception Abilities Emerged in Large Language Modelscited by 99
- 2023The Generative AI Paradox: "What It Can Create, It May Not Understand"cited by 97
50 most cited of 64 All 64 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 11; 2026: 7.
20 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2025A Comprehensive Survey in LLM(-Agent) Full Stack Safety: Data, Training and Deploymentcited by 110
- 2024A Survey on the Honesty of Large Language Modelscited by 21
- 2025Risk Analysis Techniques for Governed LLM-based Multi-Agent Systemscited by 16
- 2025Alignment and Safety in Large Language Models: Safety Mechanisms, Training Paradigms, and Emerging Challengescited by 14
- 2025DeceptionBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for AI Deception Behaviors in Real-world Scenarioscited by 14
- 2025Benchmarking LLMs' Mathematical Reasoning with Unseen Random Variables Questionscited by 7
- 2025D-REX: A Benchmark for Detecting Deceptive Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2025The Secret Agenda: LLMs Strategically Lie and Our Current Safety Tools Are Blindcited by 7
- 2024Multilevel Interpretability Of Artificial Neural Networks: Leveraging Framework And Methods From Neurosciencecited by 5
- 2025MTCMB: A Multi-Task Benchmark Framework for Evaluating LLMs on Knowledge, Reasoning, and Safety in Traditional Chinese Medicinecited by 4
- 2026Reasoning Models Will Sometimes Lie About Their Reasoningcited by 4
- 2025PRISON: Unmasking the Criminal Potential of Large Language Modelscited by 2
8 more
- 2025I'm Sorry Dave: How the old world of personnel security can inform the new world of AI insider riskcited by 1
- 2026RogueAI: A Reverse Turing Test for Detecting Licensed AI Deception in Dialoguecited by 1
- 2025AI Identity Disclosure Under Professional Personas: A Gap Between Capacity and Consistencycited by 0
- 2026Responsible AI for General-Purpose Systems: Overview, Challenges, and A Path Forwardcited by 0
- 2026Stable Reasoning, Unstable Responses: Mitigating LLM Deception via Stability Asymmetrycited by 0
- 2026DECOR: Auditing LLM Deception via Information Manipulation Theorycited by 0
- 2026From Values to Benchmarks: Evaluating Large Language Models for Governmental Use in Dutchcited by 0
- 2026Knowledge-Verified Emergent Deception in LLM Agents Under Conflicting Incentivescited by 0
- 2026Knowledge-Verified Emergent Deception in LLM Agents Under Conflicting Incentives26 Aug 2026
- 2026From Values to Benchmarks: Evaluating Large Language Models for Governmental Use in Dutch10 Aug 2026
- 2026RogueAI: A Reverse Turing Test for Detecting Licensed AI Deception in Dialogue11 Jun 2026
- 2026DECOR: Auditing LLM Deception via Information Manipulation Theory19 May 2026
- 2026Stable Reasoning, Unstable Responses: Mitigating LLM Deception via Stability Asymmetry27 Mar 2026
- 2026Responsible AI for General-Purpose Systems: Overview, Challenges, and A Path Forward19 Jan 2026
- 2026Reasoning Models Will Sometimes Lie About Their Reasoning12 Jan 2026
- 2025AI Identity Disclosure Under Professional Personas: A Gap Between Capacity and Consistency26 Nov 2025
- 2025DeceptionBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for AI Deception Behaviors in Real-world Scenarios17 Oct 2025
- 2025The Secret Agenda: LLMs Strategically Lie and Our Current Safety Tools Are Blind23 Sep 2025
- 2025D-REX: A Benchmark for Detecting Deceptive Reasoning in Large Language Models22 Sep 2025
- 2025Risk Analysis Techniques for Governed LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems6 Aug 2025
8 more
- 2025Alignment and Safety in Large Language Models: Safety Mechanisms, Training Paradigms, and Emerging Challenges25 Jul 2025
- 2025PRISON: Unmasking the Criminal Potential of Large Language Models19 Jun 2025
- 2025MTCMB: A Multi-Task Benchmark Framework for Evaluating LLMs on Knowledge, Reasoning, and Safety in Traditional Chinese Medicine2 Jun 2025
- 2025A Comprehensive Survey in LLM(-Agent) Full Stack Safety: Data, Training and Deployment22 Apr 2025
- 2025I'm Sorry Dave: How the old world of personnel security can inform the new world of AI insider risk26 Mar 2025
- 2025Benchmarking LLMs' Mathematical Reasoning with Unseen Random Variables Questions20 Jan 2025
- 2024A Survey on the Honesty of Large Language Models27 Sep 2024
- 2024Multilevel Interpretability Of Artificial Neural Networks: Leveraging Framework And Methods From Neuroscience22 Aug 2024
- 2025A Comprehensive Survey in LLM(-Agent) Full Stack Safety: Data, Training and Deploymentcited by 110
- 2025Benchmarking LLMs' Mathematical Reasoning with Unseen Random Variables Questionscited by 7
- 2025D-REX: A Benchmark for Detecting Deceptive Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2025MTCMB: A Multi-Task Benchmark Framework for Evaluating LLMs on Knowledge, Reasoning, and Safety in Traditional Chinese Medicinecited by 4
- 2026Reasoning Models Will Sometimes Lie About Their Reasoningcited by 4
- 2026Stable Reasoning, Unstable Responses: Mitigating LLM Deception via Stability Asymmetrycited by 0
- 2026Stable Reasoning, Unstable Responses: Mitigating LLM Deception via Stability Asymmetry27 Mar 2026
- 2026Reasoning Models Will Sometimes Lie About Their Reasoning12 Jan 2026
- 2025D-REX: A Benchmark for Detecting Deceptive Reasoning in Large Language Models22 Sep 2025
- 2025MTCMB: A Multi-Task Benchmark Framework for Evaluating LLMs on Knowledge, Reasoning, and Safety in Traditional Chinese Medicine2 Jun 2025
- 2025A Comprehensive Survey in LLM(-Agent) Full Stack Safety: Data, Training and Deployment22 Apr 2025
- 2025Benchmarking LLMs' Mathematical Reasoning with Unseen Random Variables Questions20 Jan 2025
- 2025DeceptionBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for AI Deception Behaviors in Real-world Scenarioscited by 14
- 2025The Secret Agenda: LLMs Strategically Lie and Our Current Safety Tools Are Blindcited by 7
- 2024Multilevel Interpretability Of Artificial Neural Networks: Leveraging Framework And Methods From Neurosciencecited by 5
- 2025PRISON: Unmasking the Criminal Potential of Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2025I'm Sorry Dave: How the old world of personnel security can inform the new world of AI insider riskcited by 1
- 2026RogueAI: A Reverse Turing Test for Detecting Licensed AI Deception in Dialoguecited by 1
- 2025AI Identity Disclosure Under Professional Personas: A Gap Between Capacity and Consistencycited by 0
- 2026Responsible AI for General-Purpose Systems: Overview, Challenges, and A Path Forwardcited by 0
- 2026DECOR: Auditing LLM Deception via Information Manipulation Theorycited by 0
- 2026From Values to Benchmarks: Evaluating Large Language Models for Governmental Use in Dutchcited by 0
- 2026From Values to Benchmarks: Evaluating Large Language Models for Governmental Use in Dutch10 Aug 2026
- 2026RogueAI: A Reverse Turing Test for Detecting Licensed AI Deception in Dialogue11 Jun 2026
- 2026DECOR: Auditing LLM Deception via Information Manipulation Theory19 May 2026
- 2026Responsible AI for General-Purpose Systems: Overview, Challenges, and A Path Forward19 Jan 2026
- 2025AI Identity Disclosure Under Professional Personas: A Gap Between Capacity and Consistency26 Nov 2025
- 2025DeceptionBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for AI Deception Behaviors in Real-world Scenarios17 Oct 2025
- 2025The Secret Agenda: LLMs Strategically Lie and Our Current Safety Tools Are Blind23 Sep 2025
- 2025PRISON: Unmasking the Criminal Potential of Large Language Models19 Jun 2025
- 2025I'm Sorry Dave: How the old world of personnel security can inform the new world of AI insider risk26 Mar 2025
- 2024Multilevel Interpretability Of Artificial Neural Networks: Leveraging Framework And Methods From Neuroscience22 Aug 2024