Terrarium: Revisiting the Blackboard for Multi-Agent Safety, Privacy, and Security Studies
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
A multi-agent system (MAS) powered by large language models (LLMs) can automate tedious user tasks such as meeting scheduling that requires inter-agent collaboration. LLMs enable nuanced protocols that account for unstructured private data, user constraints, and preferences. However, this design introduces new risks, including misalignment and attacks by malicious parties that compromise agents or steal user data. In this paper, we propose the Terrarium framework for fine-grained study on safety, privacy, and security in LLM-based MAS. We repurpose the blackboard design, an early approach in multi-agent systems, to create a modular, configurable testbed for multi-agent collaboration. We identify key attack vectors such as misalignment, malicious agents, compromised communication, and data poisoning. We implement three collaborative MAS scenarios with four representative attacks to demonstrate the framework's flexibility. By providing tools to rapidly prototype, evaluate, and iterate on defenses and designs, Terrarium aims to accelerate progress toward trustworthy multi-agent systems.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 16 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2025.
Builds on
16 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025X-Teaming: Multi-Turn Jailbreaks and Defenses with Adaptive Multi-Agents15 Apr
- 2025Multi-Agent Systems Execute Arbitrary Malicious Code15 Mar
- 2025Red-Teaming LLM Multi-Agent Systems via Communication Attacks20 Feb
- 2025Firewalls to Secure Dynamic LLM Agentic Networks3 Feb
- 2024Prompt Infection: LLM-to-LLM Prompt Injection within Multi-Agent Systems9 Oct
- 2024AirGapAgent: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agents8 May
Other references · 10
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
- 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
- 2025Model Context Protocol (MCP): Landscape, Security Threats, and Future Research Directionscited by 265
- 2013The Complexity of Decentralized Control of Markov Decision Processescited by 231
- 2025Multi-Agent Collaboration via Evolving Orchestrationcited by 108
- 2023Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiationcited by 96
- 2016Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems and Applications: A Surveycited by 26
- 2025ATLAS: Constraints-Aware Multi-Agent Collaboration for Real-World Travel Planningcited by 13
- 2025When Should We Orchestrate Multiple Agents?cited by 7
- 2025Distributed Multi-Agent Coordination Using Multi-Modal Foundation Modelscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 9.
10 papers.
- 2026Colosseum: Auditing Collusion in Cooperative Multi-Agent Systemscited by 18
- 2025ConVerse: Benchmarking Contextual Safety in Agent-to-Agent Conversationscited by 16
- 2026AI Agents May Always Fall for Prompt Injectionscited by 9
- 2026PAC-BENCH: Evaluating Multi-Agent Collaboration under Privacy Constraintscited by 7
- 2026Toward Secure LLM Agents: Threat Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluationcited by 7
- 2026Don't Trust Stubborn Neighbors: A Security Framework for Agentic Networkscited by 4
- 2026How Much Coordination Gain Is Real? A Paired Noise-Floor Protocol for Multi-Agent LLM Benchmarkscited by 2
- 2026SoK: When Safe Agents Fail Together: The Security of Multi Agent LLM Systemscited by 1
- 2026From Monoliths to Swarms: A Study of Attack Surface Evolution in the Transition to Multi-Agent Web Systemscited by 0
- 2026The Troy Moment: How LLM Agents Adjudicate the Decision Point Under Impossible Tasks, Claimed Authority, and Peer Informationcited by 0
- 2026The Troy Moment: How LLM Agents Adjudicate the Decision Point Under Impossible Tasks, Claimed Authority, and Peer Information14 Sep 2026
- 2026SoK: When Safe Agents Fail Together: The Security of Multi Agent LLM Systems1 Sep 2026
- 2026From Monoliths to Swarms: A Study of Attack Surface Evolution in the Transition to Multi-Agent Web Systems31 Jul 2026
- 2026How Much Coordination Gain Is Real? A Paired Noise-Floor Protocol for Multi-Agent LLM Benchmarks15 Jun 2026
- 2026Toward Secure LLM Agents: Threat Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluation9 Jun 2026
- 2026AI Agents May Always Fall for Prompt Injections17 May 2026
- 2026PAC-BENCH: Evaluating Multi-Agent Collaboration under Privacy Constraints13 Apr 2026
- 2026Don't Trust Stubborn Neighbors: A Security Framework for Agentic Networks16 Mar 2026
- 2026Colosseum: Auditing Collusion in Cooperative Multi-Agent Systems16 Feb 2026
- 2025ConVerse: Benchmarking Contextual Safety in Agent-to-Agent Conversations7 Nov 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Comprehensive Vulnerability Analysis is Necessary for Trustworthy LLM-MAS
- 2025Achilles Heel of Distributed Multi-Agent Systems
- 2025Seven Security Challenges in Cross-domain Multi-agent LLM Systems
- 2025MASTER: Multi-Agent Security Through Exploration of Roles and Topological Structures -- A Comprehensive Framework
- 2024Whispers in the Machine: Confidentiality in Agentic Systems
- 2024AgentMonitor: A Plug-and-Play Framework for Predictive and Secure Multi-Agent Systems
- 2025Demonstrations of Integrity Attacks in Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026From Secure Agentic AI to Secure Agentic Web: Challenges, Threats, and Future Directions