A Comprehensive Forecasting-Based Framework for Time Series Anomaly Detection: Benchmarking on the Numenta Anomaly Benchmark (NAB)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Time series anomaly detection is critical for modern digital infrastructures, yet existing methods lack systematic cross-domain evaluation. We present a comprehensive forecasting-based framework unifying classical methods (Holt-Winters, SARIMA) with deep learning architectures (LSTM, Informer) under a common residual-based detection interface. Our modular pipeline integrates preprocessing (normalization, STL decomposition), four forecasting models, four detection methods, and dual evaluation through forecasting metrics (MAE, RMSE, PCC) and detection metrics (Precision, Recall, F1, AUC). We conduct the first complete evaluation on the Numenta Anomaly Benchmark (58 datasets, 7 categories) with 232 model training runs and 464 detection evaluations achieving 100% success rate. LSTM achieves best performance (F1: 0.688, ranking first or second on 81% of datasets) with exceptional correlation on complex patterns (PCC: 0.999). Informer provides competitive accuracy (F1: 0.683) with 30% faster training. Classical methods achieve perfect predictions on simple synthetic data with 60 lower cost but show 2-3 worse F1-scores on real-world datasets. Forecasting quality dominates detection performance: differences between detection methods (F1: 0.621-0.688) are smaller than between forecasting models (F1: 0.344-0.688). Our findings provide evidence-based guidance: use LSTM for complex patterns, Informer for efficiency-critical deployments, and classical methods for simple periodic data with resource constraints. The complete implementation and results establish baselines for future forecasting-based anomaly detection research.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.
Builds on
37 of 63 references.
References · 37
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
- 2020Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecastingcited by 2,141
- 2022A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformerscited by 1,981
- 2021Autoformer: Decomposition Transformers with Auto-Correlation for Long-Term Series Forecastingcited by 1,654
- 2022Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 1,400
- 2022FEDformer: Frequency Enhanced Decomposed Transformer for Long-term Series Forecastingcited by 1,200
- 2022TimesNet: Temporal 2D-Variation Modeling for General Time Series Analysiscited by 1,030
- 2024Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Seriescited by 712
- 2024Unified Training of Universal Time Series Forecasting Transformerscited by 588
25 more
- 2022Transformers in Time Series: A Surveycited by 489
- 2018Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholdingcited by 407
- 2021Anomaly Transformer: Time Series Anomaly Detection with Association Discrepancycited by 387
- 2019Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 357
- 2021Graph Neural Network-Based Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Seriescited by 300
- 2022TranAD: Deep Transformer Networks for Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series Datacited by 211
- 2020A review on outlier/anomaly detection in time series datacited by 187
- 2020Multivariate Time-series Anomaly Detection via Graph Attention Networkcited by 165
- 2023A Survey on Graph Neural Networks for Time Series: Forecasting, Classification, Imputation, and Anomaly Detectioncited by 145
- 2020Deep Learning for Medical Anomaly Detection -- A Surveycited by 127
- 2020Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting: Tutorial and Literature Surveycited by 117
- 2021Learning Graph Structures with Transformer for Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection in IoTcited by 104
- 2023DCdetector: Dual Attention Contrastive Representation Learning for Time Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 103
- 2020Benchmarking Deep Learning Interpretability in Time Series Predictionscited by 102
- 2015Evaluating Real-time Anomaly Detection Algorithms - the Numenta Anomaly Benchmarkcited by 87
- 2018Precision and Recall for Time Seriescited by 67
- 2019Towards a Rigorous Evaluation of XAI Methods on Time Seriescited by 67
- 2021Log-based Anomaly Detection Without Log Parsingcited by 59
- 2019Adversarial Attacks on Deep Neural Networks for Time Series Classificationcited by 53
- 2021Anomaly Detection and Failure Root Cause Analysis in (Micro)Service-Based Cloud Applications: A Surveycited by 47
- 2020Self-Attentive Classification-Based Anomaly Detection in Unstructured Logscited by 36
- 2021MicroHECL: High-Efficient Root Cause Localization in Large-Scale Microservice Systemscited by 36
- 2024Dive into Time-Series Anomaly Detection: A Decade Reviewcited by 23
- 2024TimeSeriesBench: An Industrial-Grade Benchmark for Time Series Anomaly Detection Modelscited by 22
- 2023TransNAS-TSAD: Harnessing Transformers for Multi-Objective Neural Architecture Search in Time Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.