TS-PEFT: Unveiling Token-Level Redundancy in Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Current Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods typically operate under an implicit assumption: Once a target module is selected, every token passing through it contributes equally to the downstream task and requires a parameter update. In this paper, we challenge this convention by revealing a pervasive token-level redundancy in the fine-tuning of large models (LMs). We propose TS-PEFT, a theoretical framework utilizing proximal optimization that acts as a dynamic probe to identify token-level redundancy during the fine-tuning process. Extensive experiments demonstrate that indiscriminately updating all tokens is not only computationally superfluous but often introduces optimization noise. Surprisingly, by discarding 30%-70% of token updates, TS-PEFT consistently matches or exceeds the performance of dense baselines such as LoRA, DoRA. Our in-depth analysis shows that the learned token-level sparsity is a superior indicator of module importance compared to traditional weight criteria, providing a novel data-driven perspective on the intrinsic adaptation mechanism of LMs.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2025.
Builds on
26 of 36 references.
References · 26
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
- 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,031
- 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,785
- 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,219
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
- 2022Diffusion Models in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,008
14 more
- 2024DoRA: Weight-Decomposed Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 740
- 2023LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 643
- 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 641
- 2024Sora: A Review on Background, Technology, Limitations, and Opportunities of Large Vision Modelscited by 467
- 2023Sheared LLaMA: Accelerating Language Model Pre-training via Structured Pruningcited by 408
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Uglycited by 380
- 2023LLM-Adapters: An Adapter Family for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 317
- 2023Pushing Mixture of Experts to the Limit: Extremely Parameter Efficient MoE for Instruction Tuningcited by 148
- 2023When MOE Meets LLMs: Parameter Efficient Fine-tuning for Multi-task Medical Applicationscited by 110
- 2024LLaVA-MoLE: Sparse Mixture of LoRA Experts for Mitigating Data Conflicts in Instruction Finetuning MLLMscited by 84
- 2024BESA: Pruning Large Language Models with Blockwise Parameter-Efficient Sparsity Allocationcited by 44
- 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning via Selective Critical Token Fine-Tuningcited by 20
- 2023Sparsity-Guided Holistic Explanation for LLMs with Interpretable Inference-Time Interventioncited by 12
- 2025Stratos: An End-to-End Distillation Pipeline for Customized LLMs under Distributed Cloud Environmentscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.