Disentangling Reasoning Tokens and Boilerplate Tokens For Language Model Fine-tuning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
When using agent-task datasets to enhance agent capabilities for Large Language Models (LLMs), current methodologies often treat all tokens within a sample equally. However, we argue that tokens serving different roles - specifically, reasoning tokens versus boilerplate tokens (e.g., those governing output format) - differ significantly in importance and learning complexity, necessitating their disentanglement and distinct treatment. To address this, we propose a novel Shuffle-Aware Discriminator (SHAD) for adaptive token discrimination. SHAD classifies tokens by exploiting predictability differences observed after shuffling input-output combinations across samples: boilerplate tokens, due to their repetitive nature among samples, maintain predictability, whereas reasoning tokens do not. Using SHAD, we propose the Reasoning-highlighted Fine-Tuning (RFT) method, which adaptively emphasizes reasoning tokens during fine-tuning, yielding notable performance gains over common Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT).
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 15 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2024.
Builds on
15 of 36 references.
References · 15
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
- 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
- 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,302
- 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learnerscited by 814
- 2023ToolAlpaca: Generalized Tool Learning for Language Models with 3000 Simulated Casescited by 383
- 2023AgentTuning: Enabling Generalized Agent Abilities for LLMscited by 319
- 2023FireAct: Toward Language Agent Fine-tuningcited by 247
- 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Functioncited by 242
- 2023ART: Automatic multi-step reasoning and tool-use for large language modelscited by 193
- 2024APIGen: Automated Pipeline for Generating Verifiable and Diverse Function-Calling Datasetscited by 188
- 2024Rho-1: Not All Tokens Are What You Needcited by 132
- 2024AnyTool: Self-Reflective, Hierarchical Agents for Large-Scale API Callscited by 121
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2026On the Position Bias of On-Policy Distillationcited by 23
- 2025SteerX: Disentangled Steering for LLM Personalizationcited by 7
- 2026Plan, Verify and Fill: A Structured Parallel Decoding Approach for Diffusion Language Modelscited by 2
- 2025Do Stop Me Now: Detecting Boilerplate Responses with a Single Iterationcited by 0
- 2026On the Position Bias of On-Policy Distillation21 Jun 2026
- 2026Plan, Verify and Fill: A Structured Parallel Decoding Approach for Diffusion Language Models18 Jan 2026
- 2025Do Stop Me Now: Detecting Boilerplate Responses with a Single Iteration26 Oct 2025
- 2025SteerX: Disentangled Steering for LLM Personalization25 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning via Selective Critical Token Fine-Tuning
- 2026Reasoning Quality Emerges Early: Data Curation for Reasoning Models
- 2026From Reasoning Traces to Reusable Modules: Understanding Compositional Generalization in Language Model Reasoning
- 2025Weight Ensembling Improves Reasoning in Language Models
- 2025The First Few Tokens Are All You Need: An Efficient and Effective Unsupervised Prefix Fine-Tuning Method for Reasoning Models
- 2025SRFT: A Single-Stage Method with Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Reasoning
- 2025Revisiting Test-Time Scaling: A Survey and a Diversity-Aware Method for Efficient Reasoning
- 2025UFT: Unifying Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning