mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

BaNEL: Exploration Posteriors for Generative Modeling Using Only Negative Rewards

arXiv 2510.09596 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Today's generative models thrive with large amounts of supervised data and informative reward functions characterizing the quality of the generation. They work under the assumptions that the supervised data provides knowledge to pre-train the model, and the reward function provides dense information about how to further improve the generation quality and correctness. However, in the hardest instances of important problems, two problems arise: (1) the base generative model attains a near-zero reward signal, and (2) calls to the reward oracle are expensive. This setting poses a fundamentally different learning challenge than standard reward-based post-training. To address this, we propose BaNEL (Bayesian Negative Evidence Learning), an algorithm that post-trains the model using failed attempts only, while minimizing the number of reward evaluations (NREs). Our method is based on the idea that the problem of learning regularities underlying failures can be cast as another, in-loop generative modeling problem. We then leverage this model to assess whether new data resembles previously seen failures and steer the generation away from them. We show that BaNEL can improve model performance without observing a single successful sample on several sparse-reward tasks, outperforming existing novelty-bonus approaches by up to several orders of magnitude in success rate, while using fewer reward evaluations.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2025.

Builds on

26 of 38 references.

References · 26

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,546
  3. 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,194
  4. 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,136
  5. 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 993
  6. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 807
  7. 2016Unifying Count-Based Exploration and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 639
  8. 2016RL2: Fast Reinforcement Learning via Slow Reinforcement Learningcited by 503
  9. 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
  10. 2021Flow Network based Generative Models for Non-Iterative Diverse Candidate Generationcited by 392
  11. 2020Agent57: Outperforming the Atari Human Benchmarkcited by 303
  12. 2017Count-Based Exploration with Neural Density Modelscited by 257
14 more
  1. 2022Trajectory balance: Improved credit assignment in GFlowNetscited by 251
  2. 2020Never Give Up: Learning Directed Exploration Strategiescited by 212
  3. 2025The Surprising Effectiveness of Negative Reinforcement in LLM Reasoningcited by 162
  4. 2015Incentivizing Exploration In Reinforcement Learning With Deep Predictive Modelscited by 154
  5. 2019Reinforcement Learning Upside Down: Don't Predict Rewards -- Just Map Them to Actionscited by 125
  6. 2023Diffusion Models for Black-Box Optimizationcited by 76
  7. 2020VarGrad: A Low-Variance Gradient Estimator for Variational Inferencecited by 75
  8. 2022πBO: Augmenting Acquisition Functions with User Beliefs for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 70
  9. 2025Consistent Paths Lead to Truth: Self-Rewarding Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoningcited by 46
  10. 2025On Entropy Control in LLM-RL Algorithmscited by 40
  11. 2017Hindsight policy gradientscited by 37
  12. 2025Navigate the Unknown: Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Intrinsic Motivation Guided Explorationcited by 34
  13. 2024Diffusion Model for Data-Driven Black-Box Optimizationcited by 24
  14. 2022RareGAN: Generating Samples for Rare Classescited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.