mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Constrained Natural Language Action Planning for Resilient Embodied Systems

arXiv 2510.06357 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2025cs.RO cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Replicating human-level intelligence in the execution of embodied tasks remains challenging due to the unconstrained nature of real-world environments. Novel use of large language models (LLMs) for task planning seeks to address the previously intractable state/action space of complex planning tasks, but hallucinations limit their reliability, and thus, viability beyond a research context. Additionally, the prompt engineering required to achieve adequate system performance lacks transparency, and thus, repeatability. In contrast to LLM planning, symbolic planning methods offer strong reliability and repeatability guarantees, but struggle to scale to the complexity and ambiguity of real-world tasks. We introduce a new robotic planning method that augments LLM planners with symbolic planning oversight to improve reliability and repeatability, and provide a transparent approach to defining hard constraints with considerably stronger clarity than traditional prompt engineering. Importantly, these augmentations preserve the reasoning capabilities of LLMs and retain impressive generalization in open-world environments. We demonstrate our approach in simulated and real-world environments. On the ALFWorld planning benchmark, our approach outperforms current state-of-the-art methods, achieving a near-perfect 99% success rate. Deployment of our method to a real-world quadruped robot resulted in 100% task success compared to 50% and 30% for pure LLM and symbolic planners across embodied pick and place tasks. Our approach presents an effective strategy to enhance the reliability, repeatability and transparency of LLM-based robot planners while retaining their key strengths: flexibility and generalizability to complex real-world environments. We hope that this work will contribute to the broad goal of building resilient embodied intelligent systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2025.

Builds on

24 of 41 references.

References · 24

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  3. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,274
  4. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
  5. 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,401
  6. 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,143
  7. 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Modelscited by 1,057
  8. 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 850
  9. 2019ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Taskscited by 773
  10. 2022Socratic Models: Composing Zero-Shot Multimodal Reasoning with Languagecited by 513
  11. 2023LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiencycited by 496
  12. 2022LLM-Planner: Few-Shot Grounded Planning for Embodied Agents with Large Language Modelscited by 459
12 more
  1. 2023Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedbackcited by 351
  2. 2023SayPlan: Grounding Large Language Models using 3D Scene Graphs for Scalable Robot Task Planningcited by 289
  3. 2023Fast Segment Anythingcited by 286
  4. 2023Leveraging Pre-trained Large Language Models to Construct and Utilize World Models for Model-based Task Planningcited by 204
  5. 2023Generalized Planning in PDDL Domains with Pretrained Large Language Modelscited by 139
  6. 2022Mind's Eye: Grounded Language Model Reasoning through Simulationcited by 83
  7. 2024KnowAgent: Knowledge-Augmented Planning for LLM-Based Agentscited by 61
  8. 2023Errors are Useful Prompts: Instruction Guided Task Programming with Verifier-Assisted Iterative Promptingcited by 45
  9. 2024OK-Robot: What Really Matters in Integrating Open-Knowledge Models for Roboticscited by 33
  10. 2024EmbodiedRAG: Dynamic 3D Scene Graph Retrieval for Efficient and Scalable Robot Task Planningcited by 23
  11. 2024ConceptAgent: LLM-Driven Precondition Grounding and Tree Search for Robust Task Planning and Executioncited by 8
  12. 2024Reasoning about concepts with LLMs: Inconsistencies aboundcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Using Language Models as Closed-Loop High-Level Planners for Robotics Applications: A Brief Overview and Benchmarks
  2. 2025Can LLM-Reasoning Models Replace Classical Planning? A Benchmark Study
  3. 2023Dynamic Planning with a LLM
  4. 2025Think Small, Plan Smart: Minimalist Symbolic Abstraction and Heuristic Subspace Search for LLM-Guided Task Planning
  5. 2024Natural Language as Policies: Reasoning for Coordinate-Level Embodied Control with LLMs
  6. 2025Hierarchical Planning for Complex Tasks with Knowledge Graph-RAG and Symbolic Verification
  7. 2025Plan Verification for LLM-Based Embodied Task Completion Agents
  8. 2025A Systematic Study of Large Language Models for Task and Motion Planning With PDDLStream