Think Small, Plan Smart: Minimalist Symbolic Abstraction and Heuristic Subspace Search for LLM-Guided Task Planning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reliable task planning is pivotal for achieving long-horizon autonomy in real-world robotic systems. Large language models (LLMs) offer a promising interface for translating complex and ambiguous natural language instructions into actionable plans. However, their probabilistic and opaque nature often leads to logically inconsistent or infeasible outputs. To address these limitations, recent frameworks combine LLMs with symbolic planners by first generating action models (Planning Domain Definition Language) and then applying heuristic search. Although promising, such systems still suffer from representation redundancy and exponential search complexity, often resulting in inefficient or overly long plans. To improve planning efficiency and effectiveness, we propose PLAHX (Planning from Language using Abstraction and Heuristic eXploration), a two-stage LLM-symbolic planning framework that integrates abstract symbolic representations with meta-heuristic subspace search in a parallel and iterative fashion. Rather than relying on verbose LLM-generated domain models, we introduce a minimalist symbolic abstraction pipeline that preserves semantic fidelity while eliminating redundancy. Our approach redefines LLM-symbolic planning not by making LLMs smarter, but by reducing the symbolic search space adaptively. Empirical results across four challenging domains, including block stacking and robotic mobile grasping, show that our approach improves the success rate by 21.47% on average, while reducing token consumption by 13% compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 2 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2025.
Builds on
2 of 38 references.
References · 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Can LLM-Reasoning Models Replace Classical Planning? A Benchmark Study
- 2025One Demo Is All It Takes: Planning Domain Derivation with LLMs from A Single Demonstration
- 2026Agentic LLM Planning via Step-Wise PDDL Simulation: An Empirical Characterisation
- 2025Code-as-Symbolic-Planner: Foundation Model-Based Robot Planning via Symbolic Code Generation
- 2025Hierarchical Planning for Complex Tasks with Knowledge Graph-RAG and Symbolic Verification
- 2024Fast and Accurate Task Planning using Neuro-Symbolic Language Models and Multi-level Goal Decomposition
- 2025A Systematic Study of Large Language Models for Task and Motion Planning With PDDLStream
- 2025Constrained Natural Language Action Planning for Resilient Embodied Systems