mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Predictive Preference Learning from Human Interventions

arXiv 2510.01545 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.ROcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning from human involvement aims to incorporate the human subject to monitor and correct agent behavior errors. Although most interactive imitation learning methods focus on correcting the agent's action at the current state, they do not adjust its actions in future states, which may be potentially more hazardous. To address this, we introduce Predictive Preference Learning from Human Interventions (PPL), which leverages the implicit preference signals contained in human interventions to inform predictions of future rollouts. The key idea of PPL is to bootstrap each human intervention into L future time steps, called the preference horizon, with the assumption that the agent follows the same action and the human makes the same intervention in the preference horizon. By applying preference optimization on these future states, expert corrections are propagated into the safety-critical regions where the agent is expected to explore, significantly improving learning efficiency and reducing human demonstrations needed. We evaluate our approach with experiments on both autonomous driving and robotic manipulation benchmarks and demonstrate its efficiency and generality. Our theoretical analysis further shows that selecting an appropriate preference horizon L balances coverage of risky states with label correctness, thereby bounding the algorithmic optimality gap. Demo and code are available at: https://metadriverse.github.io/ppl

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2025.

Builds on

33 of 51 references.

References · 33

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  3. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  4. 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,730
  5. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  6. 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,576
  7. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
  8. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 906
  9. 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
  10. 2020robosuite: A Modular Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot Learningcited by 484
  11. 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedbackcited by 395
  12. 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translationcited by 390
21 more
  1. 2021MetaDrive: Composing Diverse Driving Scenarios for Generalizable Reinforcement Learningcited by 281
  2. 2018HG-DAgger: Interactive Imitation Learning with Human Expertscited by 245
  3. 2021Multimodal Motion Prediction with Stacked Transformerscited by 207
  4. 2023A Survey of Imitation Learning: Algorithms, Recent Developments, and Challengescited by 145
  5. 2017Deep TAMER: Interactive Agent Shaping in High-Dimensional State Spacescited by 122
  6. 2020Human-in-the-Loop Imitation Learning using Remote Teleoperationcited by 103
  7. 2017Trial without Error: Towards Safe Reinforcement Learning via Human Interventioncited by 102
  8. 2022Robot Learning on the Job: Human-in-the-Loop Autonomy and Learning During Deploymentcited by 101
  9. 2021ThriftyDAgger: Budget-Aware Novelty and Risk Gating for Interactive Imitation Learningcited by 98
  10. 2018EnsembleDAgger: A Bayesian Approach to Safe Imitation Learningcited by 96
  11. 2023Contrastive Preference Learning: Learning from Human Feedback without RLcited by 77
  12. 2018Shared Autonomy via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
  13. 2019Learning Reward Functions by Integrating Human Demonstrations and Preferencescited by 64
  14. 2022Efficient Learning of Safe Driving Policy via Human-AI Copilot Optimizationcited by 44
  15. 2020Widening the Pipeline in Human-Guided Reinforcement Learning with Explanation and Context-Aware Data Augmentationcited by 42
  16. 2024Multi-Task Interactive Robot Fleet Learning with Visual World Modelscited by 33
  17. 2014Interactive Policy Learning through Confidence-Based Autonomycited by 29
  18. 2021Safe Driving via Expert Guided Policy Optimizationcited by 29
  19. 2025Learning from Active Human Involvement through Proxy Value Propagationcited by 16
  20. 2023Guarded Policy Optimization with Imperfect Online Demonstrationscited by 10
  21. 2025Robot-Gated Interactive Imitation Learning with Adaptive Intervention Mechanismcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2020Weak Human Preference Supervision For Deep Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2025Policy-labeled Preference Learning: Is Preference Enough for RLHF?
  3. 2025Search-Based Credit Assignment for Offline Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2026PreferenceFlow: Test-Time Guidance of Flow-Matching Robot Policies from Human Interventions
  5. 2026Learning the Preferences of a Learning Agent
  6. 2025Influencing Humans to Conform to Preference Models for RLHF
  7. 2022Conditional Predictive Behavior Planning with Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Human-like Autonomous Driving
  8. 2025FDPP: Fine-tune Diffusion Policy with Human Preference