mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Weak Human Preference Supervision For Deep Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2007.12904 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2020cs.AIcited by 6

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

The current reward learning from human preferences could be used to resolve complex reinforcement learning (RL) tasks without access to a reward function by defining a single fixed preference between pairs of trajectory segments. However, the judgement of preferences between trajectories is not dynamic and still requires human input over thousands of iterations. In this study, we proposed a weak human preference supervision framework, for which we developed a human preference scaling model that naturally reflects the human perception of the degree of weak choices between trajectories and established a human-demonstration estimator via supervised learning to generate the predicted preferences for reducing the number of human inputs. The proposed weak human preference supervision framework can effectively solve complex RL tasks and achieve higher cumulative rewards in simulated robot locomotion -- MuJoCo games -- relative to the single fixed human preferences. Furthermore, our established human-demonstration estimator requires human feedback only for less than 0.01% of the agent's interactions with the environment and significantly reduces the cost of human inputs by up to 30% compared with the existing approaches. To present the flexibility of our approach, we released a video (https://youtu.be/jQPe1OILT0M) showing comparisons of the behaviours of agents trained on different types of human input. We believe that our naturally inspired human preferences with weakly supervised learning are beneficial for precise reward learning and can be applied to state-of-the-art RL systems, such as human-autonomy teaming systems.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences
  2. 2024Adaptive Preference Scaling for Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback
  3. 2023Exploiting Unlabeled Data for Feedback Efficient Human Preference based Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2024Reward Modeling with Weak Supervision for Language Models
  5. 2023Contrastive Preference Learning: Learning from Human Feedback without RL
  6. 2024Multi-Type Preference Learning: Empowering Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning with Equal Preferences
  7. 2024Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learning
  8. 2025Policy-labeled Preference Learning: Is Preference Enough for RLHF?