Adaptive Preference Optimization with Uncertainty-aware Utility Anchor
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Offline preference optimization methods are efficient for large language models (LLMs) alignment. Direct Preference optimization (DPO)-like learning, one of the most popular approaches, stands out for its efficiency in reward modeling. However, these methods typically follow the convention to use Bradley-Terry (BT) reward modeling that faces several critical assumptions, including the requirement for pairwise training data, model distribution shifting, human rationality assumption, etc. To address these limitations, we propose a general framework for offline preference optimization methods, Adaptive Preference Optimization with Utility Anchor (UAPO), which introduces an anchoring function to estimate the uncertainties brought from preference data annotation. Our method enables training even in scenarios where the data is unpaired, significantly enhancing data utilization efficiency. Moreover, the anchor design makes UAPO more robust in the training process. Experimental results demonstrate that UAPO achieves competitive outcomes without the strict dependency on data pairing, paving the way for more flexible and effective preference optimization methods.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2025.
Builds on
21 of 36 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Robust Preference Optimization through Reward Model Distillation29 May
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
- 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimization28 Mar
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
- 2024Provably Robust DPO: Aligning Language Models with Noisy Feedback1 Mar
- 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translation16 Jan
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
Other references · 13
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,095
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
- 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 500
- 2020Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?cited by 364
- 2025RewardBench 2: Advancing Reward Model Evaluationcited by 150
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference Optimization
- 2026Towards Bridging the Gap Between Offline and Iterative Alignment via Preference Distillation
- 2025Reward-aware Preference Optimization: A Unified Mathematical Framework for Model Alignment
- 2024AIPO: Improving Training Objective for Iterative Preference Optimization
- 2025Difficulty-Based Preference Data Selection by DPO Implicit Reward Gap
- 2025MaPPO: Maximum a Posteriori Preference Optimization with Prior Knowledge
- 2025Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data Selection
- 2024Direct Preference Optimization with an Offset