SCOUT: Active Information Foraging for Long-Text Understanding with Decoupled Epistemic States
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Long-Text Understanding (LTU) at million-token scale requires balancing reasoning fidelity with computational efficiency. Frontier long-context LLMs can process millions of token contexts end-to-end, but they suffer from high token consumption and attention dilution. In parallel, specialized LTU agents often sacrifice fidelity through task-agnostic abstractions like graph construction or indexing. We identify a key insight for LTU: query-relevant information is typically sparse relative to the full document, so effective reasoning should rely on a query-sufficient subset rather than the entire context. To address this, we propose SCOUT, a new paradigm for LTU that shifts from passive processing to active information foraging. It treats the document as an explorable environment and answers from a compact, provenance-grounded epistemic state. Guided by state-level gap diagnosis, SCOUT adaptively alternates between coarse-to-fine exploration and anchored state updates that progressively contract its epistemic state toward query sufficiency. Experiments show that SCOUT matches state-of-the-art proprietary models while reducing token consumption by up to 8x. Moreover, SCOUT remains stable as context length scales, substantially alleviating the practical cost-performance trade-off.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.
Builds on
25 of 37 references.
References · 25
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,411
- 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,203
- 2017The NarrativeQA Reading Comprehension Challengecited by 590
- 2024RAPTOR: Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized Retrievalcited by 519
- 2024LongBench v2: Towards Deeper Understanding and Reasoning on Realistic Long-context Multitaskscited by 367
- 2024∞Bench: Extending Long Context Evaluation Beyond 100K Tokenscited by 360
13 more
- 2025Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey on Agentic RAGcited by 242
- 2025MemAgent: Reshaping Long-Context LLM with Multi-Conv RL-based Memory Agentcited by 235
- 2024A Human-Inspired Reading Agent with Gist Memory of Very Long Contextscited by 140
- 2025ReSum: Unlocking Long-Horizon Search Intelligence via Context Summarizationcited by 132
- 2025ACON: Optimizing Context Compression for Long-horizon LLM Agentscited by 126
- 2025Chain-of-Agents: End-to-End Agent Foundation Models via Multi-Agent Distillation and Agentic RLcited by 75
- 2025DeepAgent: A General Reasoning Agent with Scalable Toolsetscited by 69
- 2023Learning to Reason and Memorize with Self-Notescited by 30
- 2025SALT: Step-level Advantage Assignment for Long-horizon Agents via Trajectory Graphcited by 22
- 2026The AI Hippocampus: How Far are We From Human Memory?cited by 11
- 2025LooGLE v2: Are LLMs Ready for Real World Long Dependency Challenges?cited by 8
- 2024RAM: Towards an Ever-Improving Memory System by Learning from Communicationscited by 6
- 2025Adaptive Preference Optimization with Uncertainty-aware Utility Anchorcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.