mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Trust Semantics Distillation for Collaborator Selection via Memory-Augmented Agentic AI

arXiv 2509.08151 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2025cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Offloading computational tasks from resource-constrained devices to resource-abundant peers constitutes a critical paradigm for collaborative computing. Within this context, accurate trust evaluation of potential collaborating devices is essential for the effective execution of complex computing tasks. This trust evaluation process involves collecting diverse trust-related information from every potential collaborator and performing trust inference based on the collected data. However, when each resource-constrained device independently assesses all potential collaborators, frequent data exchange and complex reasoning can incur significant overhead and further degrade the timeliness of trust evaluation. To overcome these challenges, we propose a task-specific trust semantics distillation (TSD) model based on a large AI model (LAM)-enabled teacher-student agent architecture. Specifically, the teacher agent is deployed on a server with powerful computational capabilities and an augmented memory module to perform multidimensional trust-related data collection, task-specific trust semantics extraction, and task-collaborator matching analysis. Upon receiving task-specific evaluation requests from device-side student agents, the teacher agent transfers the trust semantics of potential collaborators to the student agents, enabling rapid and accurate collaborator selection. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed TSD model can reduce collaborator evaluation time, decrease device resource consumption, and improve the accuracy of collaborator selection.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2025.

Builds on

8 of 17 references.

References · 8

  1. 2021Distributed Learning in Wireless Networks: Recent Progress and Future Challengescited by 125
  2. 2023Large Language Model Enhanced Multi-Agent Systems for 6G Communicationscited by 53
  3. 2023Large AI Model-Based Semantic Communicationscited by 35
  4. 2024MEDCO: Medical Education Copilots Based on A Multi-Agent Frameworkcited by 33
  5. 2019Security of the Internet of Things: Vulnerabilities, Attacks and Countermeasurescited by 12
  6. 2024Will 6G be Semantic Communications? Opportunities and Challenges from Task Oriented and Secure Communications to Integrated Sensingcited by 11
  7. 2025Chain-of-Trust: A Progressive Trust Evaluation Framework Enabled by Generative AIcited by 5
  8. 2025Networked Physical Computing: A New Paradigm for Effective Task Completion via Hypergraph Aided Trusted Task-Resource Matchingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Semantic Chain-of-Trust: Autonomous Trust Orchestration for Collaborator Selection via Hypergraph-Aided Agentic AI
  2. 2026From Role to Person: Trust Calibration Challenges in Twin Agents
  3. 2026Trustworthy Agent Network: Trust in Agent Networks Must Be Baked In, Not Bolted On
  4. 2025To trust or not to trust: Attention-based Trust Management for LLM Multi-Agent Systems
  5. 2026TAME: A Trustworthy Test-Time Evolution of Agent Memory with Systematic Benchmarking
  6. 2026TRUST: A Framework for Decentralized AI Service v.0.1
  7. 2026Trustworthy Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Cybersecurity and Systems Survey on Threat Landscapes, Defense Architectures, and Open Challenges
  8. 2026Beyond Benchmark Islands: Toward Representative Trustworthiness Evaluation for Agentic AI