Semantic Chain-of-Trust: Autonomous Trust Orchestration for Collaborator Selection via Hypergraph-Aided Agentic AI
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
The effective completion of tasks in collaborative systems hinges on task-specific trust evaluations of potential devices for distributed collaboration. Due to independent operation of devices involved, dynamic evolution of their mutual relationships, and complex situation-related impact on trust evaluation, effectively assessing devices' trust for collaborator selection is challenging. To overcome this challenge, we propose a semantic chain-of-trust model implemented with agentic AI and hypergraphs for supporting effective collaborator selection. We first introduce a concept of semantic trust, specifically designed to assess collaborators along multiple semantic dimensions for a more accurate representation of their trustworthiness. To facilitate intelligent evaluation, an agentic AI system is deployed on each device, empowering it to autonomously perform necessary operations, including device state detection, trust-related data collection, semantic extraction, task-specific resource evaluation, to derive a semantic trust representation for each collaborator. In addition, each device leverages a hypergraph to dynamically manage potential collaborators according to different levels of semantic trust, enabling fast one-hop collaborator selection. Furthermore, adjacent trusted devices autonomously form a chain through the hypergraph structure, supporting multi-hop collaborator selection. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed semantic chain-of-trust achieves 100% accuracy in trust evaluation based on historical collaborations, enabling intelligent, resource-efficient, and precise collaborator selection.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 6 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2025.
Builds on
6 of 21 references.
References · 6
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,808
- 2023Large Language Model Enhanced Multi-Agent Systems for 6G Communicationscited by 53
- 2023Large AI Model-Based Semantic Communicationscited by 35
- 2024Hypergraph-Aided Task-Resource Matching for Maximizing Value of Task Completion in Collaborative IoT Systemscited by 5
- 2025Chain-of-Trust: A Progressive Trust Evaluation Framework Enabled by Generative AIcited by 5
- 2025Rapid and Continuous Trust Evaluation for Effective Task Collaboration Through Siamese Modelcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Trust Semantics Distillation for Collaborator Selection via Memory-Augmented Agentic AI
- 2026Multi-View Trust Evaluation for Collaborator Selection via Evidential Deep Learning
- 2026Trustworthy Agent Network: Trust in Agent Networks Must Be Baked In, Not Bolted On
- 2026From Role to Person: Trust Calibration Challenges in Twin Agents
- 2026Beyond Benchmark Islands: Toward Representative Trustworthiness Evaluation for Agentic AI
- 2026Task-Aware Delegation Cues for LLM Agents
- 2026Skillsets on the Chain: A Blockchain-based Zero-Trust Framework for Agentic AI Networking
- 2026TRUST: A Framework for Decentralized AI Service v.0.1